» Articles » PMID: 27956821

Shoulder Muscle Activity During the Modified Dynamic Relocation Test and Side-lying Shoulder External Rotation: a Cross-sectional Study on Asymptomatic Individuals

Overview
Date 2016 Dec 14
PMID 27956821
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: (1) to compare activity levels between monitored muscles during the dynamic relocation test (DRT); (2) to assess changes in muscle activation variability over 10 trials; (3) to assess within-muscle difference activity levels between the DRT and the unloaded side-lying shoulder external rotation exercise.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional, laboratory-based, repeated measures study. Thirty asymptomatic individuals performed the DRT and unloaded side-lying external rotation. The order of exercises was randomized. Superficial electromyography was used for recording the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, middle deltoid, posterior deltoid, pectoralis major, and latissimus dorsi muscles. The main outcome measures were mean muscle activity, expressed as % of maximal isometric voluntary contraction.

Results: We found significant between-muscles differences in activity ( = 14.11,  < 0.001) during the DRT. Post hoc analysis suggested between-trial variability did not change over the 10 trials, ( = 18.2,  < 0.001). Within-muscle comparisons between the DRT and side-lying shoulder external rotation suggested significant differences between these exercises ( = 32.37,  < 0.001).

Conclusions: considering the monitored muscles, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, pectoralis major, and latissimus dorsi are the main muscles contracting during the DRT. Of all monitored muscles, supraspinatus muscle was the only one presenting higher activity levels during the DRT when compared to the unloaded side-lying shoulder external rotation.

Citing Articles

FOREARM POSITION MATTERS DURING ECCENTRIC SHOULDER EXERCISES: AN EMG RECRUITMENT STUDY WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION.

Hedt C, Lambert B, Daum J, Pearson J, McCulloch P Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020; 15(6):1110-1118.

PMID: 33344028 PMC: 7727430. DOI: 10.26603/ijspt20201110.

References
1.
Kidd J . Treatment of shoulder pain utilizing mechanical diagnosis and therapy principles. J Man Manip Ther. 2014; 21(3):168-73. PMC: 3744850. DOI: 10.1179/2042618613Y.0000000037. View

2.
Shemmell J, Forner M, Tresilian J, Riek S, Barry B, Carson R . Neuromuscular adaptation during skill acquisition on a two degree-of-freedom target-acquisition task: isometric torque production. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94(5):3046-57. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00670.2004. View

3.
Stanley K . Design of randomized controlled trials. Circulation. 2007; 115(9):1164-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594945. View

4.
Lee S, Kim K, ODriscoll S, Morrey B, An K . Dynamic glenohumeral stability provided by the rotator cuff muscles in the mid-range and end-range of motion. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(6):849-57. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200006000-00012. View

5.
Valero-Cuevas F, Venkadesan M, Todorov E . Structured variability of muscle activations supports the minimal intervention principle of motor control. J Neurophysiol. 2009; 102(1):59-68. PMC: 2712269. DOI: 10.1152/jn.90324.2008. View