» Articles » PMID: 27936043

Reproducibility for Heart Rate Variability Analysis During 6-Min Walk Test in Patients with Heart Failure and Agreement Between Devices

Abstract

Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is a useful method to assess abnormal functioning in the autonomic nervous system and to predict cardiac events in patients with heart failure (HF). HRV measurements with heart rate monitors have been validated with an electrocardiograph in healthy subjects but not in patients with HF. We explored the reproducibility of HRV in two consecutive six-minute walk tests (6MW), 60-minute apart, using a heart rate monitor (PolarS810i) and a portable electrocardiograph (called Holter) in 50 HF patients (mean age 59 years, NYHA II, left ventricular ejection fraction ~35%). The reproducibility for each device was analysed using a paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Additionally, we assessed the agreement between the two devices based on the HRV indices at rest, during the 6MW and during recovery using concordance correlation coefficients (CCC), 95% confidence intervals and Bland-Altman plots. The test-retest for the HRV analyses was reproducible using Holter and PolarS810i at rest but not during recovery. In the second 6MW, patients showed significant increases in rMSSD and walking distance. The PolarS810i measurements had remarkably high concordance correlation [0.86<CCC<0.99] based on Holter at rest, during 6MW and recovery. At higher rates, a small effect in increasing differences between Holter and Polar in R-R intervals was observed. In conclusion, our study showed good reproducibility of HRV at rest in two consecutive 6MW using Holter and PolarS810i. Additionally, PolarS810i produced good agreements in short-term HRV indices based on Holter simultaneous recordings at rest, during the 6MW and recovery in HF patients.

Citing Articles

Antivenom slithers back to life.

Nat Biotechnol. 2024; 42(4):537-538.

PMID: 38570693 DOI: 10.1038/s41587-024-02221-3.


Different acquisition systems for heart rate variability analysis may lead to diverse outcomes.

Oliveira Junior F, Pereira R, Silva A, Brito Alves J, Costa-Silva J, Braga V Braz J Med Biol Res. 2022; 55:e11720.

PMID: 35137854 PMC: 8852161. DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X2021e11720.


Heart rate variability in children: methodological issues and clinical applications.

Rodriguez-Nunez I, Rodriguez-Romero N, Alvarez A, Zambrano L, da Veiga G, Romero F Arch Cardiol Mex. 2021; 92(2):242-252.

PMID: 34855744 PMC: 9005168. DOI: 10.24875/ACM.20000473.

References
1.
Ponikowski P, Piepoli M, Amadi A, Chua T, Harrington D, Volterrani M . Reproducibility of heart rate variability measures in patients with chronic heart failure. Clin Sci (Lond). 1996; 91(4):391-8. DOI: 10.1042/cs0910391. View

2.
Shah S, Kambur T, Chan C, Herrington D, Liu K, Shah S . Relation of short-term heart rate variability to incident heart failure (from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). Am J Cardiol. 2013; 112(4):533-40. PMC: 3735865. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.018. View

3.
Sandercock G, Shelton C, Bromley P, Brodie D . Agreement between three commercially available instruments for measuring short-term heart rate variability. Physiol Meas. 2004; 25(5):1115-24. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/5/003. View

4.
Kervio G, Carre F, Ville N . Reliability and intensity of the six-minute walk test in healthy elderly subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(1):169-74. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200301000-00025. View

5.
Chobanian A, Bakris G, Black H, Cushman W, Green L, Izzo Jr J . Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003; 42(6):1206-52. DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2. View