» Articles » PMID: 27933843

Strategy to Achieve Highly Porous/Biocompatible Macroscale Cell Blocks, Using a Collagen/Genipin-bioink and an Optimal 3D Printing Process

Overview
Date 2016 Dec 10
PMID 27933843
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, a three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting process for obtaining a cell-laden structure has been widely applied because of its ability to fabricate biomimetic complex structures embedded with and without cells. To successfully obtain a cell-laden porous block, the cell-delivering vehicle, bioink, is one of the significant factors. Until now, various biocompatible hydrogels (synthetic and natural biopolymers) have been utilized in the cell-printing process, but a bioink satisfying both biocompatibility and print-ability requirements to achieve a porous structure with reasonable mechanical strength has not been issued. Here, we propose a printing strategy with optimal conditions including a safe cross-linking procedure for obtaining a 3D porous cell block composed of a biocompatible collagen-bioink and genipin, a cross-linking agent. To obtain the optimal processing conditions, we modified the 3D printing machine and selected an optimal cross-linking condition (∼1 mM and 1 h) of genipin solution. To show the feasibility of the process, 3D pore-interconnected cell-laden constructs were manufactured using osteoblast-like cells (MG63) and human adipose stem cells (hASCs). Under these processing conditions, a macroscale 3D collagen-based cell block of 21 × 21 × 12 mm and over 95% cell viability was obtained. In vitro biological testing of the cell-laden 3D porous structure showed that the embedded cells were sufficiently viable, and their proliferation was significantly higher; the cells also exhibited increased osteogenic activities compared to the conventional alginate-based bioink (control). The results indicated the fabrication process using the collagen-bioink would be an innovative platform to design highly biocompatible and mechanically stable cell blocks.

Citing Articles

Scaffolds Bioink for Three-Dimensional (3D) Bioprinting.

An J, Kim H Food Sci Anim Resour. 2025; 45(1):126-144.

PMID: 39840242 PMC: 11743847. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e120.


Advancements in Tissue Engineering: A Review of Bioprinting Techniques, Scaffolds, and Bioinks.

Zoghi S Biomed Eng Comput Biol. 2024; 15:11795972241288099.

PMID: 39364141 PMC: 11447703. DOI: 10.1177/11795972241288099.


Enabling 3D bioprinting of cell-laden pure collagen scaffolds via tannic acid supporting bath.

Palladino S, Copes F, Chevallier P, Candiani G, Mantovani D Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1434435.

PMID: 39295849 PMC: 11408190. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1434435.


Recent Advances in Hydrogel-Based 3D Bioprinting and Its Potential Application in the Treatment of Congenital Heart Disease.

Salih T, Caputo M, Ghorbel M Biomolecules. 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39062575 PMC: 11274841. DOI: 10.3390/biom14070861.


Investigation of Liquid Collagen Ink for Three-Dimensional Printing.

Snider C, Glover C, Grant D, Grant S Micromachines (Basel). 2024; 15(4).

PMID: 38675300 PMC: 11051860. DOI: 10.3390/mi15040490.