» Articles » PMID: 27931196

Attentional Bias Modification in Depression Through Gaze Contingencies and Regulatory Control Using a New Eye-tracking Intervention Paradigm: Study Protocol for a Placebo-controlled Trial

Overview
Journal BMC Psychiatry
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2016 Dec 10
PMID 27931196
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Attentional biases, namely difficulties both to disengage attention from negative information and to maintain it on positive information, play an important role in the onset and maintenance of the disorder. Recently, researchers have developed specific attentional bias modification (ABM) techniques aimed to modify these maladaptive attentional patterns. However, the application of current ABM procedures has yielded, so far, scarce results in depression due, in part, to some methodological shortcomings. The aim of our protocol is the application of a new ABM technique, based on eye-tracker technology, designed to objectively train the specific attentional components involved in depression and, eventually, to reduce depressive symptoms.

Methods: Based on sample size calculations, 32 dysphoric (BDI ≥13) participants will be allocated to either an active attentional bias training group or a yoked-control group. Attentional training will be individually administered on two sessions in two consecutive days at the lab. In the training task series of pairs of faces (i.e. neutral vs. sad; neutral vs. happy; happy vs. sad) will be displayed. Participants in the training group will be asked to localize as quickly as possible the most positive face of the pair (e.g., the neutral face in neutral vs. sad trials) and maintain their gaze on it for 750 ms or 1500 ms, in two different blocks, to advance to the next trial. Participants' maintenance of gaze will be measured by an eye-tracking apparatus. Participants in the yoked-control group will be exposed to the same stimuli and the same average amount of time than the experimental participants but without any instruction to maintain their gaze or any feedback on their performance. Pre and post training measures will be obtained to assess cognitive and emotional changes after the training.

Discussion: The findings from this research will provide a proof-of-principle of the efficacy of eye-tracking paradigms to modify attentional biases and, consequently, to improve depressed mood. If the findings are positive, this new training approach may result in the improvement of cognitive bias modification procedures in depression.

Trial Registration: This trial was retrospectively registered on July 28, 2016 with the ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02847793 registration number and the title 'Attentional Bias Modification Through Eye-tracker Methodology (ABMET)'.

Citing Articles

Prenatal affective cognitive training to reduce the risk of postpartum depression (PACT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Bjertrup A, Kofoed J, Egmose I, Wendelboe K, Southgate V, Vaever M Trials. 2024; 25(1):478.

PMID: 39010232 PMC: 11247870. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08316-1.


Online Contingent Attention Training (OCAT): transfer effects to cognitive biases, rumination, and anxiety symptoms from two proof-of-principle studies.

Blanco I, Boemo T, Martin-Garcia O, Koster E, De Raedt R, Sanchez-Lopez A Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023; 8(1):28.

PMID: 37156967 PMC: 10166036. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-023-00480-3.


Emotional stimulation processing characteristics in depression: Meta-analysis of eye tracking findings.

Huang G, Li Y, Zhu H, Feng H, Shen X, Chen Z Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1089654.

PMID: 36710847 PMC: 9880408. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1089654.


Gaze-Contingent Eye-Tracking Training in Brain Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Carelli L, Solca F, Tagini S, Torre S, Verde F, Ticozzi N Brain Sci. 2022; 12(7).

PMID: 35884737 PMC: 9313363. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12070931.


'Relearning how to think': A brief online intervention to modify biased interpretations in emotional disorders-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Nieto I, Vazquez C Trials. 2021; 22(1):510.

PMID: 34332616 PMC: 8325786. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05459-3.


References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

2.
Savage R, Lipp O, Craig B, Becker S, Horstmann G . In search of the emotional face: anger versus happiness superiority in visual search. Emotion. 2013; 13(4):758-68. DOI: 10.1037/a0031970. View

3.
Koster E, Bernstein A . Introduction to the special issue on Cognitive bias modification: Taking a step back to move forward?. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015; 49(Pt A):1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.05.006. View

4.
Wegner D, Zanakos S . Chronic thought suppression. J Pers. 1994; 62(4):616-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00311.x. View

5.
Emmelkamp P . Attention bias modification: the Emperor's new suit?. BMC Med. 2012; 10:63. PMC: 3391176. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-63. View