» Articles » PMID: 27928047

Validating Use of Internet-Submitted Carbon Monoxide Values by Video to Determine Quit Status

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 Dec 9
PMID 27928047
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Daily visits to biochemically verify continuous smoking abstinence via expired-air carbon monoxide (CO) may deter participation in cessation trials. One way to reduce need for daily visits while continuing to monitor abstinence success may be use of a recent procedure to verify abstinence from daily CO values via the Internet. This method requires participants submit to study staff video recordings of themselves correctly using a CO monitor. However, it has not been clearly demonstrated that those classified quit via Internet-submitted videos of CO would be reliably classified quit when assessed in lab.

Methods: Our study examined agreement in quit status from Internet-submitted CO values with quit status via CO collected in later same-day lab visits. Participants (n = 23) were from a short-term cessation study who agreed to record and submit videos of offsite CO testing, in addition to attending daily lab visits. All CO values were obtained via Bedfont pico+ Smokerlyzer monitors, with CO < 8 ppm indicating quit. During two 4-day practice quit attempts, a video was submitted before daily lab visits, up to eight videos each.

Results: Of the total of 150 videos submitted, 97 videos indicated "not quit" and 53 "quit." Cohen's Kappa indicated substantial agreement in quit status between assessments, 0.70, p < .001, as 85% of the videos indicating "quit" CO were also "quit" CO in lab.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, these results are the first validation of daily Internet-submitted CO values to confirm daily quit status, supporting the utility of this approach for close monitoring of continuous abstinence.

Implications: This study compared consistency between quit status from CO values submitted over the Internet and quit status via CO collected in later same-day lab visits. Findings indicate substantial agreement in quit status between these two methods of CO assessment. Our results validate the use of Internet-submitted CO values to verify daily quit status. This method can be used in future cessation trials as a means to biochemically validate continuous abstinence without the burden of daily lab visits or relying on self-report of recent smoking lapses.

Citing Articles

Switching behavior and changes in smoking behavior by menthol cigarette preference and menthol heated tobacco product use among adults in the United States who smoke cigarettes: an actual use study.

Karelitz J, He Y, Becker E, Vansickel A Harm Reduct J. 2025; 22(1):19.

PMID: 39980000 PMC: 11841305. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-025-01170-7.


Reintroducing face-to-face support alongside remote support to form a hybrid stop smoking service in England: a formative mixed methods evaluation.

Woodrow N, Gillespie D, Kitchin L, OBrien M, Chapman S, Chng N BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):718.

PMID: 38448869 PMC: 10916048. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18235-0.


A Scoping Review and Meta-analysis of the Use of Remote Biochemical Verification Methods of Smoking Status in Tobacco Research.

Thrul J, Howe C, Devkota J, Alexander A, Allen A, Businelle M Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 25(8):1413-1423.

PMID: 36449414 PMC: 10347976. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac271.


The 2022 Ferno Award Address: CrEATE, an Efficient Crossover Evaluation of Addiction Treatment Efficacy.

Perkins K Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 25(1):77-85.

PMID: 35671343 PMC: 9717395. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac139.


Determining Optimal Cutoffs for Exhaled Carbon Monoxide and Salivary Cotinine to Identify Smokers among Korean Americans in a Smoking Cessation Clinical Trial.

Kim S, Kim S, Gona P J Smok Cessat. 2021; 2021:6678237.

PMID: 34306232 PMC: 8279201. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6678237.


References
1.
Perkins K, Karelitz J, Jao N . Optimal carbon monoxide criteria to confirm 24-hr smoking abstinence. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012; 15(5):978-82. PMC: 3733388. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts205. View

2.
. Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2002; 4(2):149-59. DOI: 10.1080/14622200210123581. View

3.
Meredith S, Grabinski M, Dallery J . Internet-based group contingency management to promote abstinence from cigarette smoking: a feasibility study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011; 118(1):23-30. PMC: 3144260. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.02.012. View

4.
Fagerstrom K . Determinants of tobacco use and renaming the FTND to the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011; 14(1):75-8. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntr137. View

5.
McClernon F, Roy Choudhury R . I am your smartphone, and I know you are about to smoke: the application of mobile sensing and computing approaches to smoking research and treatment. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013; 15(10):1651-4. PMC: 3768335. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntt054. View