» Articles » PMID: 27921282

The Style of a Stranger: Identification Expertise Generalizes to Coarser Level Categories

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2016 Dec 7
PMID 27921282
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Experience identifying visual objects and categories improves generalization within the same class (e.g., discriminating bird species improves transfer to new bird species), but does such perceptual expertise transfer to coarser category judgments? We tested whether fingerprint experts, who spend their days comparing pairs of prints and judging whether they were left by the same finger or two different fingers, can generalize their finger discrimination expertise to people more broadly. That is, can these experts identify prints from Jones's right thumb and prints from Jones's right index finger as instances of the same "Jones" category? Novices and experts were both sensitive to the style of a stranger's prints; despite lower levels of confidence, experts were significantly more sensitive to this style than novices. This expert advantage persisted even when we reduced the number of exemplars provided. Our results demonstrate that perceptual expertise can be flexible to upwards shifts in the level of specificity, suggesting a dynamic memory retrieval process.

Citing Articles

Beyond minutiae: inferring missing details from global structure in fingerprints.

Searston R, Thompson M, Robson S, Tangen J Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025; 10(1):3.

PMID: 39900853 PMC: 11790533. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-025-00610-z.


The invisible 800-pound gorilla: expertise can increase inattentional blindness.

Robson S, Tangen J Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023; 8(1):33.

PMID: 37247030 PMC: 10226969. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-023-00486-x.


The effect of expertise, target usefulness and image structure on visual search.

Robson S, Tangen J, Searston R Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021; 6(1):16.

PMID: 33709197 PMC: 7977019. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-021-00282-5.


Interpol review of fingermarks and other body impressions 2016-2019.

Becue A, Eldridge H, Champod C Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021; 2:442-480.

PMID: 33385142 PMC: 7770454. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.013.


Human factors in forensic science: The cognitive mechanisms that underlie forensic feature-comparison expertise.

Growns B, Martire K Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020; 2:148-153.

PMID: 32490372 PMC: 7260433. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.05.001.


References
1.
Nosofsky R . Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1987; 13(1):87-108. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.13.1.87. View

2.
Medin D, Wattenmaker W, Hampson S . Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cogn Psychol. 1987; 19(2):242-79. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90012-0. View

3.
Tangen J, Thompson M, McCarthy D . Identifying fingerprint expertise. Psychol Sci. 2011; 22(8):995-7. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611414729. View

4.
Donaldson W . Measuring recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992; 121(3):275-7. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.121.3.275. View

5.
Dror I, Cole S . The vision in "blind" justice: expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010; 17(2):161-7. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.2.161. View