» Articles » PMID: 27919557

Trend Shifts in Satellite-derived Vegetation Growth in Central Eurasia, 1982-2013

Overview
Date 2016 Dec 7
PMID 27919557
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Central Eurasian vegetation is critical for the regional ecological security and the global carbon cycle. However, climatic impacts on vegetation growth in Central Eurasia are uncertain. The reason for this uncertainty lies in the fact that the response of vegetation to climate change showed nonlinearity, seasonality and differences among plant functional types. Based on remotely sensed vegetation index and in-situ meteorological data for the years 1982-2013, in conjunction with the latest land cover type product, we analyzed how vegetation growth trend varied across different seasons and evaluated vegetation response to climate variables at regional, biome and pixel scales. We found a persistent increase in the growing season NDVI over Central Eurasia during 1982-1994, whereas this greening trend has stalled since the mid-1990s in response to increased water deficit. The stalled trend in the growing season NDVI was largely attributed by summer and autumn NDVI changes. Enhanced spring vegetation growth after 2002 was caused by rapid spring warming. The response of vegetation to climatic factors varied in different seasons. Precipitation was the main climate driver for the growing season and summer vegetation growth. Changes in temperature and precipitation during winter and spring controlled the spring vegetation growth. Autumn vegetation growth was mainly dependent on the vegetation growth in summer. We found diverse responses of different vegetation types to climate drivers in Central Eurasia. Forests were more responsive to temperature than to precipitation. Grassland and desert vegetation responded more strongly to precipitation than to temperature in summer but more strongly to temperature than to precipitation in spring. In addition, the growth of desert vegetation was more dependent on winter precipitation than that of grasslands. This study has important implications for improving the performance of terrestrial ecosystem models to predict future vegetation response to climate change.

Citing Articles

Temporal variation characteristics in the association between climate and vegetation in Northwest China.

Zheng S, Peng D, Zhang B, Yu L, Pan Y, Wang Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17905.

PMID: 39095561 PMC: 11297244. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68066-7.


Vegetation Responses to Climate Change and Anthropogenic Activity in China, 1982 to 2018.

Li J, Xi M, Wang L, Li N, Wang H, Qin F Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(12).

PMID: 35742643 PMC: 9223459. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127391.


Quantitative analysis of vegetation restoration and potential driving factors in a typical subalpine region of the Eastern Tibet Plateau.

Feng Y, Wang J, Zhou Q, Bai M, Peng P, Zhao D PeerJ. 2022; 10:e13358.

PMID: 35505680 PMC: 9057294. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13358.


Continuous warming shift greening towards browning in the Southeast and Northwest High Mountain Asia.

Liu Y, Li Z, Chen Y Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):17920.

PMID: 34504166 PMC: 8429466. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97240-4.


Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Variation and Driving Mechanism of Ecological Environment Quality in the Arid Regions of Central Asia, Xinjiang.

Bi X, Chang B, Hou F, Yang Z, Fu Q, Li B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(13).

PMID: 34281046 PMC: 8296952. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18137111.