Kim S, Yun Kim H, Han J, Kim H, Ku S
PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317812.
PMID: 39869608
PMC: 11771860.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317812.
Kobanawa M, Iwami N, Hanaoka M, Enatsu K, Ichiyama T
Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76371.
PMID: 39867102
PMC: 11759662.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76371.
Schouten N, Wang R, Torrance H, Van Tilborg T, Bastu E, Bergh C
Hum Reprod Update. 2024; 31(2):116-132.
PMID: 39707165
PMC: 11879166.
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmae032.
Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Rucci C, Innocenti F, Taggi M, Pittana E
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(12):3423-3432.
PMID: 39495342
PMC: 11707217.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03299-z.
Yague-Serrano R, Palomar A, Quinonero A, Gomez V, de Los Santos M, Vidal C
Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(19).
PMID: 39408572
PMC: 11476082.
DOI: 10.3390/ijms251910237.
Development of an AI-based support system for controlled ovarian stimulation.
Asada Y, Shinohara T, Yonezawa S, Kinugawa T, Asano E, Kojima M
Reprod Med Biol. 2024; 23(1):e12603.
PMID: 39224211
PMC: 11366684.
DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12603.
Optimizing oocyte yield utilizing a machine learning model for dose and trigger decisions, a multi-center, prospective study.
Canon C, Leibner L, Fanton M, Chang Z, Suraj V, Lee J
Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):18721.
PMID: 39164339
PMC: 11335759.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69165-1.
The construction of machine learning-based predictive models for high-quality embryo formation in poor ovarian response patients with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation.
Xiao Y, Hu Y, Lv X, Huang L, Geng L, Liao P
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1):78.
PMID: 38987797
PMC: 11234746.
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01251-5.
Verification of the utility of the gonadotropin starting dose calculator in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation: A comparison of empirical and calculated controlled ovarian stimulation.
Kobanawa M, Yoshida J
Reprod Med Biol. 2024; 23(1):e12586.
PMID: 38827517
PMC: 11140174.
DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12586.
A heatmap for expected cumulative live birth rate in preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and chromosomal structural rearrangements.
Van Der Kelen A, Keymolen K, Cools W, De Vos A, Polsler L, De Vos M
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(7):1907-1915.
PMID: 38753088
PMC: 11263274.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03141-6.
Cut-off point of mature oocyte for routine clinical application of rescue IVM: a retrospective cohort study.
Wei J, Luo Z, Dong X, Jin H, Zhu L, Ai J
J Ovarian Res. 2023; 16(1):226.
PMID: 37993915
PMC: 10664607.
DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01294-z.
Does microfluidic sperm selection improve clinical pregnancy and miscarriage outcomes in assisted reproductive treatments? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aderaldo J, da Silva Maranhao K, Lanza D
PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0292891.
PMID: 37983267
PMC: 10659219.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292891.
A Markov-model simulation of IVF programs for PCOS patients indicates that coupling myo-Inositol with rFSH is cost-effective for the Italian Health System.
Beresniak A, Russo M, Forte G, Lagana A, Oliva M, Aragona C
Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):17789.
PMID: 37853019
PMC: 10584971.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44055-0.
The Relationship between Number of Supernumerary Blastocysts Cryopreserved and Probability of a Live Birth Outcome after Single Fresh Blastocyst Transfer: Analysis of over 10 Thousand Cycles.
Beebeejaun Y, Copeland T, Polanski L, El Toukhy T
J Clin Med. 2023; 12(13).
PMID: 37445207
PMC: 10342384.
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134172.
ART outcomes in lean compared to obese phenotypes of polycystic ovarian syndrome.
Fouks Y, Neuhausser W, Ryley D, Penzias A, Sakkas D, Vaughan D
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023; 40(6):1437-1445.
PMID: 37212942
PMC: 10310676.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02804-0.
The gonadotropins starting dose calculator, which can be adjusted the target number of oocytes and stimulation duration days to achieve individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in Japanese patients.
Kobanawa M
Reprod Med Biol. 2023; 22(1):e12499.
PMID: 36699956
PMC: 9853467.
DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12499.
Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive techniques.
Georgiou E, Melo P, Cheong Y, Granne I
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 11:CD004634.
PMID: 36409927
PMC: 9678381.
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004634.pub4.
Cumulative Live Birth Rate per Oocyte Aspiration in Artificial Reproduction Technology: A Retrospective Observational Study of the Association between Maternal Age and the Number of Oocytes Retrieved in an Indian Population.
Gunasheela D, Ashwini M, Appaneravanda L, Nayak H
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2022; 15(3):284-292.
PMID: 36341006
PMC: 9635378.
DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_123_22.
Retrospective analysis of GnRH-a prolonged protocol for in vitro fertilization in 18,272 cycles in China.
Tian L, Xia L, Wu Q
J Ovarian Res. 2022; 15(1):110.
PMID: 36209186
PMC: 9548105.
DOI: 10.1186/s13048-022-01044-7.
Association Between the Ratio of Ovarian Stimulation Duration to Original Follicular Phase Length and Fertilization Outcomes: A Novel Index to Optimise Clinical Trigger Time.
Zhao X, Zhang X, Wu S, Tan J
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:862500.
PMID: 35957813
PMC: 9361069.
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.862500.