» Articles » PMID: 27913914

Tragedy in Moral Case Deliberation

Overview
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2016 Dec 4
PMID 27913914
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In healthcare practice, care providers are confronted with tragic situations, in which they are expected to make choices and decisions that can have far-reaching consequences. This article investigates the role of moral case deliberation (MCD) in dealing with tragic situations. It focuses on experiences of care givers involved in the treatment of a pregnant woman with a brain tumour, and their evaluation of a series of MCD meetings in which the dilemmas around care were discussed. The study was qualitative, focusing on the views and experiences of the participants. A case study design is used by conducting semi-structured interviews (N = 10) with health care professionals who both played a role in the treatment of the patient and attended the MCD. The results show that MCD helps people to deal with tragic situations. An important element of MCD in this respect is making explicit the dilemma and the damage, demonstrating that there is no simple solution. MCD prompts participants to formulate and share personal experiences with one another and thus helps to create a shared perception of the situation as tragic. The article concludes that MCD contributes to the sharing of tragic experiences, and fosters mutual interaction during a tragedy. Its value could be increased through explicit reflection on the aspect of contingency that characterises tragedy.

Citing Articles

Qualitative study of Oncology Clinicians' Perceptions of Barriers to Offering Clinical Trials to Underserved Populations.

Perez G, Oberoi A, Finkelstein-Fox L, Park E, Nipp R, Moy B Cancer Control. 2023; 30:10732748231187829.

PMID: 37724824 PMC: 10510359. DOI: 10.1177/10732748231187829.


Paramedic experiences of providing care in wales (UK) during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic (PECC-19): a qualitative study using evolved grounded theory.

Rees N, Smythe L, Hogan C, Williams J BMJ Open. 2021; 11(6):e048677.

PMID: 34140344 PMC: 8212156. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048677.


Addressing harm in moral case deliberation: the views and experiences of facilitators.

Spronk B, Widdershoven G, Alma H BMC Med Ethics. 2020; 21(1):10.

PMID: 32000784 PMC: 6993317. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-0450-2.


Impact of moral case deliberation in healthcare settings: a literature review.

Haan M, van Gurp J, Naber S, Groenewoud A BMC Med Ethics. 2018; 19(1):85.

PMID: 30400913 PMC: 6219174. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0325-y.


Relational autonomy in the care of the vulnerable: health care professionals' reasoning in Moral Case Deliberation (MCD).

Heidenreich K, Bremer A, Materstvedt L, Tidefelt U, Svantesson M Med Health Care Philos. 2017; 21(4):467-477.

PMID: 29243015 PMC: 6267250. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-017-9818-6.

References
1.
Molewijk B, Kleinlugtenbelt D, Widdershoven G . The role of emotions in moral case deliberation: theory, practice, and methodology. Bioethics. 2011; 25(7):383-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01914.x. View

2.
Aulisio M, Arnold R, Youngner S . Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the Society for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 133(1):59-69. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-1-200007040-00012. View

3.
Johnson A, Nease Jr D, Milberg L, Addison R . Essential characteristics of effective Balint group leadership. Fam Med. 2004; 36(4):253-9. View

4.
Dauwerse L, Abma T, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G . Goals of clinical ethics support: perceptions of Dutch healthcare institutions. Health Care Anal. 2011; 21(4):323-37. PMC: 3825600. DOI: 10.1007/s10728-011-0189-5. View

5.
Fredriksen S . Tragedy, utopia and medical progress. J Med Ethics. 2006; 32(8):450-3. PMC: 2563377. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.013292. View