» Articles » PMID: 27912906

Patient and Provider Factors Associated with Endometrial Pipelle Sampling Failure

Overview
Journal Gynecol Oncol
Date 2016 Dec 4
PMID 27912906
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore risk factors associated with sampling failure in women who underwent Pipelle biopsy.

Methods: A consecutive sample of 201 patient records was selected from women who underwent Pipelle biopsy procedures for suspected uterine pathology in a large healthcare system over a 6-month period (January 2013 through June 2013). Personal and medical data including age, BMI, gravidity and parity, and previous history of Pipelle biopsy were abstracted from medical records for each patient. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with biopsy sampling failure.

Results: Pipelle biopsy sampling failed in 46 out 201 women (22.89%), where 8 (17.39%) were due to inability to access the endometrium, 37 (80.43%) were inadequate samples, and 1 (2.18%) was due to unknown reasons. Personal and medical factors found to be related to sampling failure included: postmenopausal bleeding as biopsy indication (OR 7.41, 95% CI 2.27-24.14); history of prior biopsy failure (OR 23.87, 95% CI 3.76-151.61); and provider type (physician vs. midlevel provider) (OR 9.152, 95% CI 2.49-33.69).

Conclusion: We identified several risk factors for biopsy failure that suggest the need for particular care with Pipelle sampling procedures among women with certain characteristics, including postmenopausal bleeding and a history of prior failed Pipelle biopsy. Our finding of a significantly higher risk of sampling failure based on personal and clinical data suggests that providers must take into account additional considerations to improve sampling success.

Citing Articles

Quantitative Assessment of Polarization and Elastic Properties of Endometrial Tissue for Precancer/Cancer Diagnostics Using Multimodal Optical Coherence Tomography.

Plekhanov A, Grechkanev G, Avetisyan E, Loginova M, Kiseleva E, Shepeleva A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39410535 PMC: 11475316. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14192131.


Rate and risk factors of inadequate endometrial tissues after endometrial sampling among Bhutanese women at the national referral hospital of Bhutan: a cross-sectional study.

Dorji N, Dorjey Y, Tshering S, Pradhan B, Chhetri M, Bhujel D BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):214.

PMID: 38566186 PMC: 10988946. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03047-6.


Minimally invasive approaches for the early detection of endometrial cancer.

Shen Y, Yang W, Liu J, Zhang Y Mol Cancer. 2023; 22(1):53.

PMID: 36932368 PMC: 10022290. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-023-01757-3.


Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer Using the Surgical Intelligent Knife (iKnife)-A Prospective Pilot Study of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Marcus D, Phelps D, Savage A, Balog J, Kudo H, Dina R Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(23).

PMID: 36497372 PMC: 9736036. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235892.


Factors Influencing on Pain in Patients Undergoing Pipelle Endometrial Biopsy for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: Why a Personalized Approach Should Be Applied?.

Terzic M, Aimagambetova G, Ukybassova T, Bapayeva G, Kaiyrlykyzy A, Foster F J Pers Med. 2022; 12(3).

PMID: 35330431 PMC: 8950507. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12030431.