Non-equilibrium Dynamics from RPMD and CMD
Overview
Chemistry
Affiliations
We investigate the calculation of approximate non-equilibrium quantum time correlation functions (TCFs) using two popular path-integral-based molecular dynamics methods, ring-polymer molecular dynamics (RPMD) and centroid molecular dynamics (CMD). It is shown that for the cases of a sudden vertical excitation and an initial momentum impulse, both RPMD and CMD yield non-equilibrium TCFs for linear operators that are exact for high temperatures, in the t = 0 limit, and for harmonic potentials; the subset of these conditions that are preserved for non-equilibrium TCFs of non-linear operators is also discussed. Furthermore, it is shown that for these non-equilibrium initial conditions, both methods retain the connection to Matsubara dynamics that has previously been established for equilibrium initial conditions. Comparison of non-equilibrium TCFs from RPMD and CMD to Matsubara dynamics at short times reveals the orders in time to which the methods agree. Specifically, for the position-autocorrelation function associated with sudden vertical excitation, RPMD and CMD agree with Matsubara dynamics up to O(t) and O(t), respectively; for the position-autocorrelation function associated with an initial momentum impulse, RPMD and CMD agree with Matsubara dynamics up to O(t) and O(t), respectively. Numerical tests using model potentials for a wide range of non-equilibrium initial conditions show that RPMD and CMD yield non-equilibrium TCFs with an accuracy that is comparable to that for equilibrium TCFs. RPMD is also used to investigate excited-state proton transfer in a system-bath model, and it is compared to numerically exact calculations performed using a recently developed version of the Liouville space hierarchical equation of motion approach; again, similar accuracy is observed for non-equilibrium and equilibrium initial conditions.
Kroes G, Meyer J Chem Sci. 2024; 16(2):480-506.
PMID: 39640030 PMC: 11616778. DOI: 10.1039/d4sc06004k.
Bracher C, Allen C, Singleton D J Am Chem Soc. 2024; 146(38):25907-25911.
PMID: 39284010 PMC: 11440546. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.4c09306.
Gerrits N, Jackson B, Bogaerts A J Phys Chem Lett. 2024; 15(9):2566-2572.
PMID: 38416779 PMC: 10926167. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c03408.
Quantitative molecular simulations.
Topfer K, Upadhyay M, Meuwly M Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2022; 24(21):12767-12786.
PMID: 35593769 PMC: 9158373. DOI: 10.1039/d2cp01211a.
Yuan Y, Li J, Li X, Wang F J Chem Phys. 2018; 148(18):184102.
PMID: 29764147 PMC: 5940466. DOI: 10.1063/1.5027433.