» Articles » PMID: 27904925

Breaking Sitting with Light Activities Vs Structured Exercise: a Randomised Crossover Study Demonstrating Benefits for Glycaemic Control and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Journal Diabetologia
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2016 Dec 2
PMID 27904925
Citations 72
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: We aimed to examine the effects of breaking sitting with standing and light-intensity walking vs an energy-matched bout of structured exercise on 24 h glucose levels and insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: In a randomised crossover study, 19 patients with type 2 diabetes (13 men/6 women, 63 ± 9 years old) who were not using insulin each followed three regimens under free-living conditions, each lasting 4 days: (1) Sitting: 4415 steps/day with 14 h sitting/day; (2) Exercise: 4823 steps/day with 1.1 h/day of sitting replaced by moderate- to vigorous-intensity cycling (at an intensity of 5.9 metabolic equivalents [METs]); and (3) Sit Less: 17,502 steps/day with 4.7 h/day of sitting replaced by standing and light-intensity walking (an additional 2.5 h and 2.2 h, respectively, compared with the hours spent doing these activities in the Sitting regimen). Blocked randomisation was performed using a block size of six regimen orders using sealed, non-translucent envelopes. Individuals who assessed the outcomes were blinded to group assignment. Meals were standardised during each intervention. Physical activity and glucose levels were assessed for 24 h/day by accelerometry (activPAL) and a glucose monitor (iPro2), respectively. The incremental AUC (iAUC) for 24 h glucose (primary outcome) and insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) were assessed on days 4 and 5, respectively.

Results: The iAUC for 24 h glucose (mean ± SEM) was significantly lower during the Sit Less intervention than in Sitting (1263 ± 189 min × mmol/l vs 1974 ± 324 min × mmol/l; p = 0.002), and was similar between Sit Less and Exercise (Exercise: 1383 ± 194 min × mmol/l; p = 0.499). Exercise failed to improve HOMA2-IR compared with Sitting (2.06 ± 0.28 vs 2.16 ± 0.26; p = 0.177). In contrast, Sit Less (1.89 ± 0.26) significantly reduced HOMA2-IR compared with Exercise (p = 0.015) as well as Sitting (p = 0.001).

Conclusions/interpretation: Breaking sitting with standing and light-intensity walking effectively improved 24 h glucose levels and improved insulin sensitivity in individuals with type 2 diabetes to a greater extent than structured exercise. Thus, our results suggest that breaking sitting with standing and light-intensity walking may be an alternative to structured exercise to promote glycaemic control in patients type 2 diabetes.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02371239 FUNDING: : The study was supported by a Kootstra grant from Maastricht University Medical Centre, and the Dutch Heart Foundation. Financial support was also provided by Novo Nordisk BV, and Medtronic and Roche made the equipment available for continuous glucose monitoring.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Physical Activity in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Bassin S, Srinath R Am J Lifestyle Med. 2025; 19(1):147-161.

PMID: 39822318 PMC: 11733108. DOI: 10.1177/15598276231180541.


Effect of physical activity breaks during prolonged sitting on vascular outcomes: A scoping review.

Shruthi P, Chandrasekaran B, Vaishali K, Shivashankar K, Sukumar S, Ravichandran S J Educ Health Promot. 2024; 13:294.

PMID: 39416984 PMC: 11482367. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1773_23.


Accelerometer-measured physical activity, sedentary behavior, and incidence of macrovascular and microvascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes.

Liang Y, He Y, Huang P, Feng H, Li H, Ai S J Sport Health Sci. 2024; 14:100973.

PMID: 39214513 PMC: 11863271. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100973.


Movement- and Posture-based Measures of Sedentary Patterns and Associations with Metabolic Syndrome in Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic Adults.

Jankowska M, Tribby C, Hibbing P, Carlson J, Greenwood-Hickman M, Sears D J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024; .

PMID: 39134907 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-02114-w.


Association between glucose-lowering drugs and circulating insulin antibodies induced by insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Zhang P, Jiang Q, Ding B, Yan R, Hu Y, Ma J World J Diabetes. 2024; 15(7):1489-1498.

PMID: 39099829 PMC: 11292328. DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i7.1489.


References
1.
Martin A, Fitzsimons C, Jepson R, Saunders D, van der Ploeg H, Teixeira P . Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 49(16):1056-63. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094524. View

2.
Tucker J, Welk G, Beyler N . Physical activity in U.S.: adults compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40(4):454-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.016. View

3.
Matthews C, Chen K, Freedson P, Buchowski M, Beech B, Pate R . Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167(7):875-81. PMC: 3527832. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm390. View

4.
Pai L, Li T, Hwu Y, Chang S, Chen L, Chang P . The effectiveness of regular leisure-time physical activities on long-term glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016; 113:77-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.01.011. View

5.
Henson J, Davies M, Bodicoat D, Edwardson C, Gill J, Stensel D . Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting With Standing or Walking Attenuates the Postprandial Metabolic Response in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Acute Study. Diabetes Care. 2015; 39(1):130-8. DOI: 10.2337/dc15-1240. View