» Articles » PMID: 27900057

and Inhibition of Tumor Cell Viability by Combined Dihydroartemisinin and Doxorubicin Treatment, and the Underlying Mechanism

Overview
Journal Oncol Lett
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Dec 1
PMID 27900057
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The natural extract artemisinin and its derivatives have good anticancer activity. The present study aimed to investigate the inhibitory effects of combined dihydroartemisinin (DHA) and doxorubicin (DOX) treatment on a variety of tumor cell lines (HeLa, OVCAR-3, MCF-7, PC-3 and A549), as well as the underlying mechanisms. In addition, the in vivo effects of DHA and DOX were evaluated using a mouse HeLa tumor model. The HeLa, OVCAR-3, MCF-7, PC-3 and A549 cells were treated with a combination of DHA and DOX, and the effect on cell viability was detected by Cell Counting kit-8. The cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope after staining with Hoechst 33258 dye to observe morphological changes in the nuclei in order to determine whether the cells in the treatment group exhibited apoptosis. Apoptosis of the cells was further detected by flow cytometry, and statistical analysis was performed. The specific inhibitors of caspase-3, -8 and -9 were used to determine the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of cell apoptosis. The cervical cancer HeLa cells treated with the combination of DHA and DOX showed up to a 91.5% decrease in viability, which was higher than that of the same cells treated with DHA or DOX alone at the same concentration, respectively (P<0.01). The optimal concentrations of the drugs used in combination were DHA at 10 µg/ml and DOX at 10 µg/ml. DHA + DOX also had a significant inhibitory effect on the ovarian cancer (OVCAR-3), breast cancer (MCF-7), lung cancer (A549) and prostate cancer (PC-3) cells. The images observed under fluorescence microscope after Hoechst 33258 staining showed marked pyknosis in the cells treated with DHA + DOX, similar to that when treated with DHA or DOX alone, which is typical in apoptosis. As determined by flow cytometry, the apoptotic rate of the cells treated with DHA + DOX at optimal concentrations was up to 90%, which was significantly higher than that of the cells treated with DHA or DOX alone at the same concentration. Caspase-9 and -3 inhibitors significantly increased the viability of the cells treated with DHA + DOX. At 6 days post-intratumoral injection of DHA + DOX, the tumor volume was markedly reduced. toxicity results revealed that the combination of the drugs had basically no effect on the body weight of the mice and had no significant toxicity on the liver, spleen, kidneys and heart of the animals. Overall, the combination of DHA and DOX markedly inhibited the viability of the HeLa, OVCAR-3, MCF-7, PC-3 and A549 cells, and acted on the HeLa cells through the intrinsic apoptotic pathway mediated by caspase-9 and caspase-3. DHA + DOX also had a significant treatment effect . This study provides a novel idea for the development of a clinical medication against several types of cancer.

Citing Articles

Synergistic anticancer effects of SMYD2 inhibitor BAY-598 and doxorubicin in non-small cell lung cancer.

Meng J, Yang W, Li C, Li F Heliyon. 2024; 10(11):e32015.

PMID: 38947456 PMC: 11214464. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32015.


p53 at the Crossroads between Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity and Resistance: A Nutritional Balancing Act.

Guo Y, Tang Y, Lu G, Gu J Nutrients. 2023; 15(10).

PMID: 37242146 PMC: 10222243. DOI: 10.3390/nu15102259.


Susceptibility of cervical cancer to dihydroartemisinin-induced ferritinophagy-dependent ferroptosis.

Shi H, Xiong L, Yan G, Du S, Liu J, Shi Y Front Mol Biosci. 2023; 10:1156062.

PMID: 37065442 PMC: 10102504. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1156062.


Dihydroartemisinin Reduces Irradiation-Induced Mitophagy and Radioresistance in Lung Cancer A549 Cells via CIRBP Inhibition.

Wu S, Li Z, Li H, Liao K Life (Basel). 2022; 12(8).

PMID: 36013308 PMC: 9410454. DOI: 10.3390/life12081129.


Effects of dihydroartemisinin combined with cisplatin on proliferation, apoptosis and migration of HepG2 cells.

Rao Q, Li R, Yu H, Xiang L, He B, Wu F Oncol Lett. 2022; 24(2):275.

PMID: 35782905 PMC: 9247656. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13395.


References
1.
Huang F, Lee T, Chang C, Chen L, Hsu W, Chang C . Evaluation of 188Re-labeled PEGylated nanoliposome as a radionuclide therapeutic agent in an orthotopic glioma-bearing rat model. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015; 10:463-73. PMC: 4296959. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S75955. View

2.
Karavitis J, Zhang M . COX2 regulation of breast cancer bone metastasis. Oncoimmunology. 2013; 2(3):e23129. PMC: 3661150. DOI: 10.4161/onci.23129. View

3.
Roth A, Maibach R, Martinelli G, Fazio N, Aapro M, Pagani O . Docetaxel (Taxotere)-cisplatin (TC): an effective drug combination in gastric carcinoma. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), and the European Institute of Oncology (EIO). Ann Oncol. 2000; 11(3):301-6. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008342013224. View

4.
Parkin D, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P . Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer. 2001; 94(2):153-6. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1440. View

5.
Sun Q, Teong B, Chen I, Chang S, Gao J, Kuo S . Enhanced apoptotic effects of dihydroartemisinin-aggregated gelatin and hyaluronan nanoparticles on human lung cancer cells. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013; 102(3):455-62. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33023. View