» Articles » PMID: 27896270

The Assessment of Facial Expressions in Piglets Undergoing Tail Docking and Castration: Toward the Development of the Piglet Grimace Scale

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2016 Nov 30
PMID 27896270
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many piglets are exposed to potentially painful husbandry procedures within the first week of life, including tail docking and castration, without the provision of either anesthesia or analgesia. The assessment methods used to evaluate pain experienced by piglets are often affected by low specificity and practical limitations, prompting the investigation of alternative methodologies. The assessment of changes in facial expression following a painful event has been successfully applied to several species. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the utility of a Grimace Scale applied to neonatal pigs to evaluate pain evoked by tail docking and castration. Eight female piglets, (Landrace/Large White X synthetic sire line) underwent tail docking and 15 male piglets (75% Large White and 25% Belgian Landrace) were exposed to the castration procedure. Clear images of the faces of the piglets were collected immediately pre- and post-procedure. The images were used by experienced observers to identify facial action units (FAUs) which changed in individuals over this period, and a scoring scale was depicted in a training manual. A set of randomly selected images were then combined in a scorebook, which was evaluated after training by 30 scorers, blind to the treatment. The scale for most FAU was used with a high level of consistency across all observers. Tail docking induced a significant change ( < 0.05) in free moving piglets only in the "orbital tightening" FAU, whereas no change in any unit was observed in castrated piglets, which were restrained at the time of assessment. In this initial stage of development, orbital tightening seems to have the potential to be applied to investigate painful conditions in neonatal pigs. Nonetheless, more studies are needed to assess its full effectiveness and to evaluate the influence of possible confounds (e.g., handling stress) on the observed changes in FAUs.

Citing Articles

Part I: understanding pain in pigs-basic knowledge about pain assessment, measures and therapy.

Kschonek J, Twele L, Deters K, Miller M, Reinmold J, Emmerich I Porcine Health Manag. 2025; 11(1):12.

PMID: 40069905 PMC: 11895375. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-025-00421-0.


Comparison between AI and human expert performance in acute pain assessment in sheep.

Feighelstein M, Luna S, Silva N, Trindade P, Shimshoni I, van der Linden D Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):626.

PMID: 39754012 PMC: 11698723. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83950-y.


Automated landmark-based cat facial analysis and its applications.

Martvel G, Lazebnik T, Feighelstein M, Meller S, Shimshoni I, Finka L Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1442634.

PMID: 39717789 PMC: 11663861. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1442634.


Neurobiology and Anatomy of Facial Expressions in Great Apes: Application of the AnimalFACS and Its Possible Association with the Animal's Affective State.

Dominguez-Oliva A, Chavez C, Martinez-Burnes J, Olmos-Hernandez A, Hernandez-Avalos I, Mota-Rojas D Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682379 PMC: 11640284. DOI: 10.3390/ani14233414.


Automated video-based pain recognition in cats using facial landmarks.

Martvel G, Lazebnik T, Feighelstein M, Henze L, Meller S, Shimshoni I Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28006.

PMID: 39543343 PMC: 11564822. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78406-2.


References
1.
Leach M, Klaus K, Miller A, Scotto di Perrotolo M, Sotocinal S, Flecknell P . The assessment of post-vasectomy pain in mice using behaviour and the Mouse Grimace Scale. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e35656. PMC: 3338444. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035656. View

2.
de C Williams A . Facial expression of pain: an evolutionary account. Behav Brain Sci. 2003; 25(4):439-55; discussion 455-88. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x02000080. View

3.
Mogil J, Crager S . What should we be measuring in behavioral studies of chronic pain in animals?. Pain. 2004; 112(1-2):12-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.028. View

4.
Bertholle C, Meijer E, Back W, Stegeman A, van Weeren P, Van Nes A . A longitudinal study on the performance of in vivo methods to determine the osteochondrotic status of young pigs. BMC Vet Res. 2016; 12:62. PMC: 4807589. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0682-z. View

5.
Simons S, Tibboel D . Pain perception development and maturation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006; 11(4):227-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2006.02.010. View