» Articles » PMID: 27893396

Enhanced Control of Cortical Pyramidal Neurons With Micromagnetic Stimulation

Overview
Publisher IEEE
Date 2016 Nov 29
PMID 27893396
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Magnetic stimulation is less sensitive to the inflammatory reactions that plague conventional electrode-based cortical implants and therefore may be useful as a next-generation (implanted) cortical prosthetic. The fields arising from micro-coils are quite small however and thus, their ability to modulate cortical activity must first be established. Here, we show that layer V pyramidal neurons (PNs) can be strongly activated by micro-coil stimulation and further, the asymmetric fields arising from such coils do not simultaneously activate horizontally-oriented axon fibers, thus confining activation to a focal region around the coil. The spatially-narrow fields from micro-coils allowed the sensitivity of different regions within a single PN to be compared: while the proximal axon was most sensitive in naïve cells, repetitive stimulation over the apical dendrite led to a change in state of the neuron that reduced thresholds there to below those of the axon. Thus, our results raise the possibility that regardless of the mode of stimulation, penetration depths that target specific portions of the apical dendrite may actually be more effective than those that target Layer 6. Interestingly, the state change had similar properties to state changes described previously at the systems level, suggesting a possible neuronal mechanism underlying such responses.

Citing Articles

Restore axonal conductance in a locally demyelinated axon with electromagnetic stimulation.

Ye H, Chen Y, Chen J, Hendee J J Neural Eng. 2025; 22(1).

PMID: 39904055 PMC: 11827109. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/adb213.


Microfabrication Technologies for Nanoinvasive and High-Resolution Magnetic Neuromodulation.

Ge C, Masalehdan T, Shojaei Baghini M, Duran Toro V, Signorelli L, Thomson H Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(46):e2404254.

PMID: 39445520 PMC: 11633526. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202404254.


Transparent and Conformal Microcoil Arrays for Spatially Selective Neuronal Activation.

Raghuram V, Datye A, Fried S, Timko B Device. 2024; 2(4).

PMID: 39184953 PMC: 11343507. DOI: 10.1016/j.device.2024.100290.


Functional and Effective Connectivity Underlying Semantic Verbal Fluency.

Arrigo I, da Silva P, Leoni R Brain Topogr. 2024; 37(6):1043-1054.

PMID: 38839695 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-024-01059-x.


Cellular mechanisms underlying carry-over effects after magnetic stimulation.

Ye H, Dima M, Hall V, Hendee J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5167.

PMID: 38431662 PMC: 10908793. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55915-8.


References
1.
Hu W, Tian C, Li T, Yang M, Hou H, Shu Y . Distinct contributions of Na(v)1.6 and Na(v)1.2 in action potential initiation and backpropagation. Nat Neurosci. 2009; 12(8):996-1002. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2359. View

2.
Pell G, Roth Y, Zangen A . Modulation of cortical excitability induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: influence of timing and geometrical parameters and underlying mechanisms. Prog Neurobiol. 2010; 93(1):59-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.10.003. View

3.
Histed M, Ni A, Maunsell J . Insights into cortical mechanisms of behavior from microstimulation experiments. Prog Neurobiol. 2012; 103:115-30. PMC: 3535686. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.01.006. View

4.
Tehovnik E, Slocum W . Electrical induction of vision. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013; 37(5):803-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.012. View

5.
Vertes R . Interactions among the medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and midline thalamus in emotional and cognitive processing in the rat. Neuroscience. 2006; 142(1):1-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.06.027. View