» Articles » PMID: 27893218

Measuring Response Styles in Likert Items

Overview
Journal Psychol Methods
Specialty Psychology
Date 2016 Nov 29
PMID 27893218
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The recently proposed class of item response tree models provides a flexible framework for modeling multiple response processes. This feature is particularly attractive for understanding how response styles may affect answers to attitudinal questions. Facilitating the disassociation of response styles and attitudinal traits, item response tree models can provide powerful process tests of how different response formats may affect the measurement of substantive traits. In an empirical study, 3 response formats were used to measure the 2-dimensional Personal Need for Structure traits. Different item response tree models are proposed to capture the response styles for each of the response formats. These models show that the response formats give rise to similar trait measures but different response-style effects. (PsycINFO Database Record

Citing Articles

A solution to the pervasive problem of response bias in self-reports.

Grimmond J, Brown S, Hawkins G Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(3):e2412807122.

PMID: 39823303 PMC: 11759895. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2412807122.


Robust estimation of the latent trait in graded response models.

Filonczuk A, Cheng Y Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(1):55.

PMID: 39809944 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02574-2.


Ensemble representation of animacy could be based on mid-level visual features.

Tiurina N, Markov Y Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 87(2):415-430.

PMID: 39630351 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02976-6.


Separation of Traits and Extreme Response Style in IRTree Models: The Role of Mimicry Effects for the Meaningful Interpretation of Estimates.

Merhof V, Bohm C, Meiser T Educ Psychol Meas. 2024; 84(5):927-956.

PMID: 39318484 PMC: 11418598. DOI: 10.1177/00131644231213319.


On the Utility of Indirect Methods for Detecting Faking.

Goldammer P, Stockli P, Escher Y, Annen H, Jonas K Educ Psychol Meas. 2024; 84(5):841-868.

PMID: 39318482 PMC: 11418592. DOI: 10.1177/00131644231209520.