» Articles » PMID: 27891156

Usefulness of Component Resolved Analysis of Cat Allergy in Routine Clinical Practice

Overview
Date 2016 Nov 29
PMID 27891156
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cat allergy is of great importance, and its prevalence is increasing worldwide. Cat allergens and house dust mite allergens represent the major indoor allergens; however, they are ubiquitous. Cat sensitization and allergy are known risk factors for rhinitis, bronchial hyperreactivity and asthma. Thus, the diagnosis of sensitization to cats is important for any allergist.

Methods: 70 patients with positive skin prick tests for cats were retrospectively compared regarding their skin prick test results, as well as their specific immunoglobulin E antibody profiles with regard to their responses to the native cat extract, rFel d 1, nFel d 2 and rFel d 4. 35 patients were allergic to cats, as determined by positive anamnesis and/or nasal provocation with cat allergens, and 35 patients exhibited clinically non-relevant sensitization, as indicated by negative anamnesis and/or a negative nasal allergen challenge.

Results: Native cat extract serology testing detected 100% of patients who were allergic to cats but missed eight patients who showed sensitization in the skin prick test and did not have allergic symptoms. The median values of the skin prick test, as well as those of the specific immunoglobulin E antibodies against the native cat extract, were significantly higher for allergic patients than for patients with clinically non-relevant sensitization. Component based diagnostic testing to rFel d 1 was not as reliable. Sensitization to nFel d 2 and rFel d 4 was seen only in individual patients.

Conclusion: Extract based diagnostic methods for identifying cat allergy and sensitization, such as the skin prick test and native cat extract serology, remain crucial in routine clinical practice. In our study, component based diagnostic testing could not replace these methods with regard to the detection of sensitization to cats and differentiation between allergy and sensitization without clinical relevance. However, component resolved allergy diagnostic tools have individual implications, and future studies may facilitate a better understanding of its use and subsequently may improve the clinical management of allergic patients.

Citing Articles

V Brazilian Consensus on Rhinitis - 2024.

Sole D, Kuschnir F, Pastorino A, Constantino C, Galvao C, Chong E Silva D Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 91(1):101500.

PMID: 39388827 PMC: 11497470. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101500.


Sensitization patterns to cat molecular allergens in subjects with allergic sensitization to cat dander.

Ozuygur Ermis S, Norouzi A, Borres M, Basna R, Ekerljung L, Malmhall C Clin Transl Allergy. 2023; 13(8):e12294.

PMID: 37632243 PMC: 10422092. DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12294.


Human allergy to cats: A review for veterinarians on prevalence, causes, symptoms and control.

Sparkes A J Feline Med Surg. 2021; 24(1):31-42.

PMID: 34622710 PMC: 8721530. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X211036793.


Component resolved analysis of ash pollen allergy in Bavaria.

Eder K, Gellrich D, Messmer C, Canis M, Groger M Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018; 14:76.

PMID: 30455718 PMC: 6222990. DOI: 10.1186/s13223-018-0291-4.


An update on molecular cat allergens: Fel d 1 and what else? Chapter 1: Fel d 1, the major cat allergen.

Bonnet B, Messaoudi K, Jacomet F, Michaud E, Fauquert J, Caillaud D Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018; 14:14.

PMID: 29643919 PMC: 5891966. DOI: 10.1186/s13223-018-0239-8.


References
1.
Almqvist C, Wickman M, Perfetti L, Berglind N, Renstrom A, Hedren M . Worsening of asthma in children allergic to cats, after indirect exposure to cat at school. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001; 163(3 Pt 1):694-8. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.3.2006114. View

2.
Linneberg A, Nielsen N, Madsen F, Frolund L, Dirksen A, Jorgensen T . Increasing prevalence of specific IgE to aeroallergens in an adult population: two cross-sectional surveys 8 years apart: the Copenhagen Allergy Study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000; 106(2):247-52. DOI: 10.1067/mai.2000.108312. View

3.
Riechelmann H, Bachert C, Goldschmidt O, Hauswald B, Klimek L, Schlenter W . [Application of the nasal provocation test on diseases of the upper airways. Position paper of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (ENT Section) in cooperation with the Working Team for Clinical Immunology]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2003; 82(3):183-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-38411. View

4.
Konradsen J, Fujisawa T, van Hage M, Hedlin G, Hilger C, Kleine-Tebbe J . Allergy to furry animals: New insights, diagnostic approaches, and challenges. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 135(3):616-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.08.026. View

5.
Charpin C, Mata P, Charpin D, Lavaut M, Allasia C, Vervloet D . Fel d I allergen distribution in cat fur and skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991; 88(1):77-82. DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(91)90303-6. View