» Articles » PMID: 27881719

Neuronal Pattern Separation of Motion-relevant Input in LIP Activity

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2016 Nov 25
PMID 27881719
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In various regions of the brain, neurons discriminate sensory stimuli by decreasing the similarity between ambiguous input patterns. Here, we examine whether this process of pattern separation may drive the rapid discrimination of visual motion stimuli in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP). Starting with a simple mean-rate population model that captures neuronal activity in LIP, we show that overlapping input patterns can be reformatted dynamically to give rise to separated patterns of neuronal activity. The population model predicts that a key ingredient of pattern separation is the presence of heterogeneity in the response of individual units. Furthermore, the model proposes that pattern separation relies on heterogeneity in the temporal dynamics of neural activity and not merely in the mean firing rates of individual neurons over time. We confirm these predictions in recordings of macaque LIP neurons and show that the accuracy of pattern separation is a strong predictor of behavioral performance. Overall, results propose that LIP relies on neuronal pattern separation to facilitate decision-relevant discrimination of sensory stimuli. A new hypothesis is proposed on the role of the lateral intraparietal (LIP) region of cortex during rapid decision making. This hypothesis suggests that LIP alters the representation of ambiguous inputs to reduce their overlap, thus improving sensory discrimination. A combination of computational modeling, theoretical analysis, and electrophysiological data shows that the pattern separation hypothesis links neural activity to behavior and offers novel predictions on the role of LIP during sensory discrimination.

Citing Articles

Estimating null and potent modes of feedforward communication in a computational model of cortical activity.

Thivierge J, Pilzak A Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):742.

PMID: 35031628 PMC: 8760251. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04684-9.


Estimating Fisher discriminant error in a linear integrator model of neural population activity.

Calderini M, Thivierge J J Math Neurosci. 2021; 11(1):6.

PMID: 33606089 PMC: 7895896. DOI: 10.1186/s13408-021-00104-4.


Embodied working memory during ongoing input streams.

Berberian N, Ross M, Chartier S PLoS One. 2021; 16(1):e0244822.

PMID: 33400724 PMC: 7785253. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244822.

References
1.
Goldman M . Memory without feedback in a neural network. Neuron. 2009; 61(4):621-34. PMC: 2674525. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.012. View

2.
Latimer K, Yates J, Meister M, Huk A, Pillow J . NEURONAL MODELING. Single-trial spike trains in parietal cortex reveal discrete steps during decision-making. Science. 2015; 349(6244):184-7. PMC: 4799998. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa4056. View

3.
Zandbelt B, Purcell B, Palmeri T, Logan G, Schall J . Response times from ensembles of accumulators. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(7):2848-53. PMC: 3932860. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310577111. View

4.
Chapuis J, Wilson D . Bidirectional plasticity of cortical pattern recognition and behavioral sensory acuity. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 15(1):155-61. PMC: 3245808. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2966. View

5.
Cisek P, Puskas G, El-Murr S . Decisions in changing conditions: the urgency-gating model. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(37):11560-71. PMC: 6665752. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1844-09.2009. View