» Articles » PMID: 27879924

Comparison of Mercury Distribution Between Liver and Muscle - A Biomonitoring of Fish from Lightly and Heavily Contaminated Localities

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2016 Nov 24
PMID 27879924
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tissue samples from 1,117 fish of 25 species were collected from 1991 through 1996 at 13 locations along the River Elbe. The principal indicator species were perch (Perca fluviatilis) (n=118), chub (Leuciscus cephalus L.) (n=113) and roach (Rutilus rutilus) (n=138). Mercury (Hg) concentrations in muscle and liver were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry. The liver/muscle index in three indicator species from heavily contaminated and lightly contaminated localities were significantly different. In fish from heavily contaminated localities, Hg was deposited preferentially in the liver (the depository for inorganic and organic forms of Hg), while in lightly contaminated areas, it was deposited preferentially in muscle.

Citing Articles

Maternal provisioning interacts with incubation temperature to affect hatchling mercury exposure in an oviparous reptile.

Johnson J, Smaga C, Bock S, Parrott B Biol Lett. 2023; 19(8):20230097.

PMID: 37554010 PMC: 10410221. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0097.


Mercury accumulation and biomarkers of exposure in two popular recreational fishes in Hawaiian waters.

Holbert S, Bryan C, Korsmeyer K, Jensen B Ecotoxicology. 2023; 32(8):1010-1023.

PMID: 37491684 PMC: 10622350. DOI: 10.1007/s10646-023-02684-1.


10-year time course of Hg and organic compounds in Augusta Bay: Bioavailability and biological effects in marine organisms.

Benedetti M, Romano E, Ausili A, Fattorini D, Gorbi S, Maggi C Front Public Health. 2022; 10:968296.

PMID: 36211646 PMC: 9532743. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.968296.


Ecotoxicology of mercury in burbot (Lota lota) from interior Alaska and insights towards human health.

Walther E, Arthur D, Cyr A, Fraley K, Cubbage T, Hinkle E Chemosphere. 2022; 298:134279.

PMID: 35283142 PMC: 9081214. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134279.


Do the total mercury concentrations detected in fish from Czech ponds represent a risk for consumers?.

Pavla S, Danka H, Premysl M, Denisa M, Kristyna M, Zdenka S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):553.

PMID: 35017608 PMC: 8752681. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04561-5.


References
1.
Foster E, Drake D, DIDOMENICO G . Seasonal changes and tissue distribution of mercury in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) from Dorena Reservoir, Oregon. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1999; 38(1):78-82. DOI: 10.1007/s002449910010. View

2.
Berg V, Ugland K, Hareide N, Groenningen D, Skaare J . Mercury, cadmium, lead, and selenium in fish from a Norwegian fjord and off the coast, the importance of sampling locality. J Environ Monit. 2001; 2(4):375-7. DOI: 10.1039/b002784g. View

3.
Cizdziel J, Hinners T, Pollard J, Heithmar E, Cross C . Mercury concentrations in fish from Lake Mead, USA, related to fish size, condition, trophic level, location, and consumption risk. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2002; 43(3):309-17. DOI: 10.1007/s00244-002-1191-6. View

4.
Arribere M, Ribeiro Guevara S, Sanchez R, Gil M, Roman Ross G, Daurade L . Heavy metals in the vicinity of a chlor-alkali factory in the Upper Negro River ecosystem, Northern Patagonia, Argentina. Sci Total Environ. 2002; 301(1-3):187-203. DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(02)00301-7. View

5.
Farkas A, Salanki J, Specziar A . Age- and size-specific patterns of heavy metals in the organs of freshwater fish Abramis brama L. populating a low-contaminated site. Water Res. 2003; 37(5):959-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00447-5. View