Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Gallbladder Drainage Reduces Adverse Events Compared with Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Patients Who Are Unfit for Cholecystectomy
Overview
Pharmacology
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
There are no data comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gallbladder drainage (EGBD) with percutaneous cholecystostomy as a treatment for patients with acute cholecystitis. This was a 1 : 1 matched cohort study of all patients who were unfit for cholecystectomy and underwent EGBD or percutaneous cholecystostomy instead for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. The outcomes were matched for age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade. Outcome measures included the technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, hospital stay, the number of unplanned admissions, and mortality. Between November 2011 and August 2014, a total of 118 patients were included in the study (59 EGBD, 59 percutaneous cholecystostomy). Technical and clinical success rates were similar. In the EGBD group, significantly fewer patients suffered from overall adverse events (19 [32.2 %] vs. 44 [74.6 %]; < 0.001) and serious adverse events (14 [23.7 %] vs. 44 [74.6 %]; < 0.001) compared to the percutaneous cholecystostomy group. Patients in the EGBD group required fewer unplanned admissions (4 [6.8 %] vs. 42 [71.2 %]; < 0.001), which were due to problems related to the cholecystostomy tube in 95.2 %. The 30-day adverse event rates were similar between the groups (17 [28.8 %] vs. 10 [16.9 %]; = 0.13). For instance, recurrent acute cholecystitis occurred in 0 patients in the EGBD group and in 4 (6.8 %) patients in the percutaneous cholecystostomy group ( = 0.12). The 30-day mortality rates were non-significantly higher in the EGBD group (5 [8.5 %] vs. 1 [1.7 %]; = 0.21). EGBD and percutaneous cholecystostomy were both effective means of achieving gallbladder drainage. EGBD may be a promising alternative to percutaneous cholecystostomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis in patients who are unfit for surgery, provided that experienced endosonographers are available.
Pan C, Ramai D, Beran A, Wang Y, Huang Y, Morris J Endosc Int Open. 2025; 13:a25210084.
PMID: 40018071 PMC: 11866036. DOI: 10.1055/a-2521-0084.
David Y, Kakked G, Confer B, Shah R, Khara H, Diehl D Endosc Int Open. 2025; 13:a24955542.
PMID: 39958659 PMC: 11827723. DOI: 10.1055/a-2495-5542.
One-year outcomes of elderly acute cholecystitis patients by index treatment.
Lluis N, Villodre C, Guilabert L, de Castro I, Zapater P, Martinez B Front Surg. 2025; 12:1500700.
PMID: 39949524 PMC: 11821576. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1500700.
Xu R, Zhang K, Guo J, Sun S Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024; 17:17562848241299755.
PMID: 39635228 PMC: 11615986. DOI: 10.1177/17562848241299755.
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis.
Fok J, Teoh A, Chan S Dig Endosc. 2024; 37(1):93-102.
PMID: 39552245 PMC: 11718140. DOI: 10.1111/den.14946.