» Articles » PMID: 27873117

Mitigation of Pre-existing Antibodies to a Biotherapeutic in Non-clinical Species When Establishing Anti-drug Antibody Assay Cutpoint

Overview
Journal AAPS J
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2016 Nov 23
PMID 27873117
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biotherapeutics are known for their potential to induce drug specific immune responses, which are commonly evaluated by the detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). For some biotherapeutics, pre-existing ADAs against drug have been observed in drug-naïve matrix. The presence of pre-existing drug specific antibodies may significantly complicate assessment of the screening ADA assay cutpoint value, which is usually established based on the statistical analysis of signal distribution from the drug-naïve individuals. A Gaussian mixture model-based approach is presented herein to address high prevalence of pre-existing ADAs to a modified monoclonal antibody-based biotherapeutic (m-mAb). A high prevalence of pre-existing anti-m-mAb antibodies was observed in drug-naïve individual cynomolgus monkey serum samples with signal ranging from 100 to 7000 relative light units (RLU, as determined in an electrochemiluminescence readout-based assay). Application of the industry standard statistical algorithm resulted in a relatively high floating screening assay cutpoint factor (CPF) of 9.80, which potentially would have reported a high percent of false negative samples. An alternative, Gaussian mixture model-based approach was applied to identify the least reactive individual samples in the tested population, which resulted in a floating screening assay CPF of 2.35. The low CPF value significantly reduced the risk of reporting false negative results. The proposed Gaussian mixture model-based approach described herein provides an alternate method for the calculation of biologically relevant screening assay CPF when high prevalence of pre-existing drug specific antibodies is observed.

Citing Articles

Neutralizing Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization.

Myler H, Pedras-Vasconcelos J, Lester T, Civoli F, Xu W, Wu B AAPS J. 2023; 25(4):69.

PMID: 37421491 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-023-00830-5.


Design of antibody variable fragments with reduced reactivity to preexisting anti-drug antibodies.

Johansson M, Weinert C, Reichardt D, Mahler D, Diem D, Hess C MAbs. 2023; 15(1):2215887.

PMID: 37312434 PMC: 10269415. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2023.2215887.


Evaluation of the Humoral Response to Adeno-Associated Virus-Based Gene Therapy Modalities Using Total Antibody Assays.

Gorovits B, Azadeh M, Buchlis G, Harrison T, Havert M, Jawa V AAPS J. 2021; 23(6):108.

PMID: 34529177 PMC: 8445016. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-021-00628-3.


Implementation of a three-tiered approach to identify and characterize anti-drug antibodies raised against HIV-specific broadly neutralizing antibodies.

Bharadwaj P, Riekofski C, Lin S, Seaman M, Garber D, Montefiori D J Immunol Methods. 2020; 479:112764.

PMID: 32070674 PMC: 7103756. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2020.112764.


Recommendations for the Development of Cell-Based Anti-Viral Vector Neutralizing Antibody Assays.

Gorovits B, Fiscella M, Havert M, Koren E, Long B, Milton M AAPS J. 2020; 22(2):24.

PMID: 31907680 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-019-0403-1.


References
1.
Shankar G, Devanarayan V, Amaravadi L, Barrett Y, Bowsher R, Finco-Kent D . Recommendations for the validation of immunoassays used for detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008; 48(5):1267-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.09.020. View

2.
Mikulskis A, Yeung D, Chen W, Mehta D, Amaravadi L . Novel data analysis methods to overcome cut point challenges and enable comprehensive assessment of antidrug binding activity in confirmatory assays. J Immunol Methods. 2013; 392(1-2):38-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2013.03.008. View

3.
Jaki T, Lawo J, Wolfsegger M, Singer J, Allacher P, Horling F . A formal comparison of different methods for establishing cut points to distinguish positive and negative samples in immunoassays. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011; 55(5):1148-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.04.006. View

4.
Gorovits B, Clements-Egan A, Birchler M, Liang M, Myler H, Peng K . Pre-existing Antibody: Biotherapeutic Modality-Based Review. AAPS J. 2016; 18(2):311-20. PMC: 4779092. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-016-9878-1. View

5.
Zhang L, Zhang J, Kubiak R, Yang H . Statistical methods and tool for cut point analysis in immunogenicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 2013; 389(1-2):79-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.12.008. View