» Articles » PMID: 27861661

Retrospective Cohort Study of 4,591 Straumann Implants Placed in 2,060 Patients in Private Practice with Up to 10-Year Follow-up: The Relationship Between Crestal Bone Level and Soft Tissue Condition

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2016 Nov 19
PMID 27861661
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this report is to describe the crestal bone level (CBL) around implants of various designs, describe the peri-implant soft tissue condition, and evaluate the relationship between the two over time.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective cohort study reports on 2,060 patients with 4,591 implants evaluated after 3 months; 1, 3, 5, and 7 years; and up to 10 years. Periapical radiographs were used to evaluate changes in CBL. The peri-implant soft tissue was evaluated using a modified Bleeding Index termed the Implant Mucosal Index (IMI) where: 0 = no bleeding; 1 = minimal, single-point bleeding; 2 = moderate, multipoint bleeding; 3 = profuse, multipoint bleeding; and 4 = suppuration.

Results: At 3 months, the mean CBL was 0.06 ± 0.22 mm; by 8 to 10 years, it had increased to 0.44 ± 0.81 mm. The median CBL remained stable throughout the study at < 0.1 mm. At 8 to 10 years, 15% of implants exhibited a CBL > 1.02 mm, and 5% exhibited a CBL > 2.28 mm. More than 50% of patients experienced some bleeding, as seen by an IMI ≥ 1 during follow-up. A positive correlation was found between IMI and CBL, as shown by a mean CBL after 4 years of 0.33 mm, 0.71 mm, and 1.52 mm for IMI = 2, 3, and 4, respectively. One exception was between IMI = 0 and IMI = 1, where no significant difference was found and bone loss was minimal.

Conclusion: Bone loss, as measured by changes in CBL during the first 10 years of implant life spans, was minimal for most implants. Nevertheless, it is not unusual to observe implants with advanced bone loss. The soft tissue condition is a good indicator of bone loss. Time alone and minimal bleeding did not correlate with bone loss, but care should be taken for implants with profuse bleeding or suppuration.

Citing Articles

Early marginal peri-implant bone loss around tissue-level implants: a retrospective radiographic evaluation.

Solderer A, Giuliani C, Wiedemeier D, Jung R, Schmidlin P Int J Implant Dent. 2025; 11(1):20.

PMID: 40074979 PMC: 11903984. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-025-00613-x.


Protein profile at newly restored implants compared to contralateral teeth over 12-months: a pilot study.

Apatzidou D, Violesti A, Konstantinidis A, Bao K, Silbereisen A, Bostanci N Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(11):590.

PMID: 39390228 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05984-w.


Update on Focal Infection Management: A Czech Interdisciplinary Consensus.

Perina V, Smucler R, Nemec P, Bartak V Int Dent J. 2023; 74(3):510-518.

PMID: 38044216 PMC: 11123548. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.11.001.


Cross-sectional evaluation of clinical and immunological parameters at partially microgrooved vs machined abutments in humans.

Iglhaut G, Salomon S, Fretwurst T, Thomas P, Endres J, Kessler S Int J Implant Dent. 2021; 7(1):46.

PMID: 34031775 PMC: 8144255. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00329-8.


Long term clinical performance of 10 871 dental implants with up to 22 years of follow-up: A cohort study in 4247 patients.

French D, Ofec R, Levin L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021; 23(3):289-297.

PMID: 33768695 PMC: 8359846. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12994.