» Articles » PMID: 27857523

Impact of Different Oral Hygiene Aids for the Reduction of Morning Bad Breath Among Dental Students: a Crossover Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Clujul Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Nov 19
PMID 27857523
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: To assess and compare the effects of different oral hygiene procedures on the reduction of morning bad breath, plaque and gingival status in healthy subjects.

Methods: A four step cross-over trial was performed on 32 study subjects. They were allocated into four groups: Group I: tooth brushing; Group II: tooth brushing and tongue scraping; Group III: tooth brushing and mouth washing; and Group IV: tooth brushing, tongue scraping and use of mouthwash. A washout interval of 7 days was employed. At the beginning and at the end of all intervention periods, breath score was measured by hand held sulfide monitor (Breath Alert) at four time intervals. The Plaque and Gingival status was evaluated using Plaque and Gingival Index.

Results: The highest reduction in mean breath score (2.12±0.65), plaque score (0.75±0.47) and gingival score (0.67±0.41) were found in the Group IV followed by Group II and Group III. A significant positive correlation was observed between plaque scores and gingival scores before intervention (r=0.443; p value<0.001) and after intervention (r=0.846; p value<0.001).

Conclusion: The study findings suggest that mechanical aids in conjunction with chemical regimens are considered as the most effective method for reducing the morning bad breath in healthy subjects and should be incorporated in daily oral hygiene practices.

Citing Articles

Comparative Evaluation of Antiplaque Efficacy of Coconut Oil Pulling and a Placebo, Among Dental College Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nagilla J, Kulkarni S, Madupu P, Doshi D, Bandari S, Srilatha A J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11(9):ZC08-ZC11.

PMID: 29207824 PMC: 5713846. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26656.10563.

References
1.
Roldan S, Herrera D, Santa-Cruz I, OConnor A, Gonzalez I, Sanz M . Comparative effects of different chlorhexidine mouth-rinse formulations on volatile sulphur compounds and salivary bacterial counts. J Clin Periodontol. 2004; 31(12):1128-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00621.x. View

2.
Pedrazzi V, Sato S, De Mattos M, Lara E, Panzeri H . Tongue-cleaning methods: a comparative clinical trial employing a toothbrush and a tongue scraper. J Periodontol. 2004; 75(7):1009-12. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.7.1009. View

3.
Oliveira-Neto J, Sato S, Pedrazzi V . How to deal with morning bad breath: A randomized, crossover clinical trial. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014; 17(6):757-61. PMC: 3917206. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.124497. View

4.
Grundemann L, Timmerman M, Ijzerman Y, Van der Weijden G . Stain, plaque and gingivitis reduction by combining chlorhexidine and peroxyborate. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27(1):9-15. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027001009.x. View

5.
Newby E, Hickling J, Hughes F, Proskin H, Bosma M . Control of oral malodour by dentifrices measured by gas chromatography. Arch Oral Biol. 2008; 53 Suppl 1:S19-25. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9969(08)70005-0. View