» Articles » PMID: 27853841

Sentinel Node Biopsy and Lymphatic Mapping in Penile and Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal Urologe A
Specialty Urology
Date 2016 Nov 18
PMID 27853841
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Nodal metastases are linked to poor outcome in men with penile or prostate cancer. Early detection and resection are important for staging and for the prognosis. However, lymphadenectomy is associated with morbidity and may miss metastases when performed solely on the basis of anatomical templates.

Methods: In this article we describe the technique and benefits of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and provide a review of the literature.

Results: Dynamic sentinel node techniques using both radioactive and optical (hybrid) tracers have been proven effective in penile cancer. For prostate cancer, SNB added to extended nodal dissection may further tailor dissection to the highly variable lymphatic drainage patterns in the pelvis. The sensitivity of SNB was found to be superior to conventional imaging methods; however, false-negative SNB procedures can occur and a complementary extensive lymphadenectomy is required to remove additional positive nodes that were not detected in the SNB template.

Conclusion: SNB is a standard method for early detection of nodal metastases in penile cancer and provides superior diagnostic accuracy to conventional imaging modalities in prostate cancer.

Citing Articles

How molecular imaging will enable robotic precision surgery : The role of artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and navigation.

Wendler T, van Leeuwen F, Navab N, van Oosterom M Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; 48(13):4201-4224.

PMID: 34185136 PMC: 8566413. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05445-6.


Anatomical localization of radiocolloid tracer deposition affects outcome of sentinel node procedures in prostate cancer.

de Korne C, Wit E, de Jong J, Valdes Olmos R, Buckle T, van Leeuwen F Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019; 46(12):2558-2568.

PMID: 31377820 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04443-z.


Sentinel lymph node imaging in urologic oncology.

Mehralivand S, van der Poel H, Winter A, Choyke P, Pinto P, Turkbey B Transl Androl Urol. 2018; 7(5):887-902.

PMID: 30456192 PMC: 6212622. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.08.23.


Clinical use of an opto-nuclear probe for hybrid sentinel node biopsy guidance: first results.

Vidal-Sicart S, Seva A, Campos F, Sanchez N, Alonso I, Pahisa J Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018; 14(2):409-416.

PMID: 29968113 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1816-5.


Validation and head-to-head comparison of three nomograms predicting probability of lymph node invasion of prostate cancer in patients undergoing extended and/or sentinel lymph node dissection.

Grivas N, Wit E, Tillier C, van Muilekom E, Pos F, Winter A Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017; 44(13):2213-2226.

PMID: 28780722 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3788-z.

References
1.
Maurer T, Eiber M, Schwaiger M, Gschwend J . Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Urol. 2016; 13(4):226-35. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.26. View

2.
Wawroschek F, Vogt H, Bachter D, Weckermann D, Hamm M, Harzmann R . First experience with gamma probe guided sentinel lymph node surgery in penile cancer. Urol Res. 2000; 28(4):246-9. DOI: 10.1007/s002400000125. View

3.
Weckermann D, Hamm M, Dorn R, Wagner T, Wawroschek F, Harzmann R . [Sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Experience after more than 800 interventions]. Urologe A. 2006; 45(6):723-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00120-006-1030-x. View

4.
Hautmann S, Beitz S, Naumann M, LUtzen U, Seif C, Stubinger S . [Extended sentinel lymph node dissection in radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a study in the Kiel risk population]. Urologe A. 2008; 47(3):299-303. DOI: 10.1007/s00120-008-1652-2. View

5.
Jeschke S, Lusuardi L, Myatt A, Hruby S, Pirich C, Janetschek G . Visualisation of the lymph node pathway in real time by laparoscopic radioisotope- and fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer staging. Urology. 2012; 80(5):1080-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.05.050. View