» Articles » PMID: 27853734

Electronic Cigarettes on Twitter - Spreading the Appeal of Flavors

Overview
Journal Tob Regul Sci
Date 2016 Nov 18
PMID 27853734
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Social media platforms are used by tobacco companies to promote products. This study examines message content on Twitter from e-cigarette brands and determines if messages about flavors are more likely than non-flavor messages to be passed along to other viewers.

Methods: We examined Twitter data from 2 e-cigarette brands and identified messages that contained terms related to e-cigarette flavors.

Results: Flavor-related posts were retweeted at a significantly higher rate by e-cigarette brands (p = .04) and other Twitter users (p < .01) than non-flavor posts.

Conclusions: E-cigarette brands and other Twitter users pay attention to flavor-related posts and retweet them often. These findings suggest flavors continue to be an attractive characteristic and their marketing should be monitored closely.

Citing Articles

Social Media Marketing Strategies for Electronic Cigarettes: Content Analysis of Chinese Weibo Accounts.

Zhou X, Hao X, Chen Y, Deng H, Fang L, Zhang L J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e51594.

PMID: 39509702 PMC: 11582489. DOI: 10.2196/51594.


The commercial promotion of electronic cigarettes on social media and its influence on positive perceptions of vaping and vaping behaviours in Anglophone countries: A scoping review.

Chacon L, Mitchell G, Golder S PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(1):e0002736.

PMID: 38232105 PMC: 10793929. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002736.


Exploring Factors That Predict Marketing of e-Cigarette Products on Twitter: Infodemiology Approach Using Time Series.

Ezike N, Boykin A, Dobbs P, Mai H, Primack B JMIR Infodemiology. 2023; 2(2):e37412.

PMID: 37113447 PMC: 9987194. DOI: 10.2196/37412.


Categorizing IQOS-Related Twitter Discussions.

Barker J, Vassey J, Chen-Sankey J, Allem J, Cruz T, Unger J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(9).

PMID: 33946546 PMC: 8124933. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094836.


Sex differences in associations between receiving and sharing tobacco-related information and tobacco product use among Appalachian Youth.

Mattingly D, Pfeiffer J, Walker K, Hart J Popul Med. 2021; 2(August).

PMID: 33629078 PMC: 7899165. DOI: 10.18332/popmed/125911.


References
1.
Kim A, Arnold K, Makarenko O . E-cigarette advertising expenditures in the U.S., 2011-2012. Am J Prev Med. 2014; 46(4):409-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.003. View

2.
Barrington-Trimis J, Samet J, McConnell R . Flavorings in electronic cigarettes: an unrecognized respiratory health hazard?. JAMA. 2014; 312(23):2493-4. PMC: 4361011. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.14830. View

3.
Huang J, Kornfield R, Szczypka G, Emery S . A cross-sectional examination of marketing of electronic cigarettes on Twitter. Tob Control. 2014; 23 Suppl 3:iii26-30. PMC: 4078681. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051551. View

4.
Minaker L, Ahmed R, Hammond D, Manske S . Flavored tobacco use among Canadian students in grades 9 through 12: prevalence and patterns from the 2010-2011 youth smoking survey. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014; 11:E102. PMC: 4068113. DOI: 10.5888/pcd11.140094. View

5.
Bunnell R, Agaku I, Arrazola R, Apelberg B, Caraballo R, Corey C . Intentions to smoke cigarettes among never-smoking US middle and high school electronic cigarette users: National Youth Tobacco Survey, 2011-2013. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014; 17(2):228-35. PMC: 4515756. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu166. View