» Articles » PMID: 27853687

The Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcome of Abdominoplasty Operations

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2016 Nov 18
PMID 27853687
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Increased body mass index (BMI) increase the incidence of seroma formation and wound infection rates and subsequently increases wound dehiscence and ugly scar formation following abdomenoplasty and body contour surgery and also many other aesthetic and plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of BMI on the outcome of abdominoplasty operation.

Methods: We carried out a prospective study of all patients who underwent abdominoplasty at our institution. Patient were divided into two groups. Group I were subjects with body mass index <30 kg/m while group II were patients with body mass index >30 kg/m. Demographics and complications (minor and major) were recorded.

Results: Sixty seven patients were enrolled. Group I were 32 patients with a mean age of 35.71 and group II 35 patients with mean age of 36.26 years. Seroma formation, wound complications, prolonged hospital stay and complications were significantly more in group II.

Conclusion: We found that increased BMI significantly increased operative time, hospital stay, drainage duration and drainage amount. Our findings showed that obesity alone could increase the incidence of complications and poor outcome of abdominoplasty.

Citing Articles

Comparison of clinician- and patient-reported outcome measures in 95 abdominoplasty cases using BODY-Q and MCCRO-Q.

Kitching S, Rocco C, Harwood R, Ross G JPRAS Open. 2025; 43:438-457.

PMID: 39980598 PMC: 11840526. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.01.004.


The Use of BODY-Q to Assess Factors Impacting Satisfaction and Quality-of-life Postabdominoplasty in Kenya.

Nyakiongora S, Laspro M, Dele-Oni O, Abdullahi A, Nangole F, Pusic A Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025; 13(2):e6539.

PMID: 39949577 PMC: 11822338. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006539.


The Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on Postoperative Outcomes in Abdominal Body Contouring: A Propensity Score-Matched Nationwide Analysis.

Escobar-Domingo M, Taritsa I, Mahmoud A, Fanning J, Hernandez Alvarez A, Escobar-Domingo D Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; 48(20):4168-4177.

PMID: 39014238 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04227-3.


Reply to Letter to Editor 'Lipoabdominoplasty: Comparing UAL Versus UAL/PAL Techniques on Complication Profile and Patient Safety'.

Duran A, Buyukdogan H Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; .

PMID: 38302711 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-03851-3.


Lipoabdominoplasty: Comparing UAL Versus UAL/PAL Techniques on Complication Profile and Patient Safety.

Duran A, Buyukdogan H Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023; 48(3):369-375.

PMID: 37962624 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03741-0.


References
1.
Spiegelman J, Levine R . Abdominoplasty: a comparison of outpatient and inpatient procedures shows that it is a safe and effective procedure for outpatients in an office-based surgery clinic. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118(2):517-22. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000227630.88566.74. View

2.
Staalesen T, Elander A, Strandell A, Bergh C . A systematic review of outcomes of abdominoplasty. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012; 46(3-4):139-44. DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2012.683794. View

3.
Avelar J . Abdominoplasty combined with lipoplasty without panniculus undermining: abdominolipoplasty--a safe technique. Clin Plast Surg. 2006; 33(1):79-90, vii. DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2005.08.007. View

4.
Zuelzer H, Ratliff C, Drake D . Complications of abdominal contouring surgery in obese patients: current status. Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 64(5):598-604. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181cf9f9e. View

5.
Brauman D, Capocci J . Liposuction abdominoplasty: an advanced body contouring technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124(5):1685-1695. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b98c5d. View