» Articles » PMID: 27852041

Accuracy of Axillary Ultrasound After Different Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Cycles in Breast Cancer Patients

Overview
Journal Oncotarget
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Nov 17
PMID 27852041
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study determined whether axillary ultrasound (AUS) accurately predicted the status of axillary lymph nodes of patients who received different number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Materials And Methods: From 2008 to 2015, 656 cases of patients with breast cancers who received NAC and had subsequent axillary lymph node dissection were included in this study. The findings of preoperative AUS were tested by pathological examination. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of AUS for patients who received two-, four-, and six-cycle NAC.

Results: In the two-cycle subgroup, the sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 80.2% (95% CI: 74.3%-86.2%), 61.4% (95% CI: 48.8%-74.0%) and 6.64 (95% CI: 3.36-12.4) respectively. In the four-cycle subgroup, the Sn, Sp and DOR were 69.7% (95% CI: 62.2%-77.1%), 66.1% (95% CI: 53.7%-78.5%) and 4.47 (95% CI: 2.32-8.62), respectively. In the six-cycle subgroup, the Sn, Sp and DOR were 56.7% (95% CI: 49.5%-64.0%), 74.5% (95% CI: 62.8%-87.2%) and 3.83 (95% CI: 1.863-7.86), respectively. Furthermore, the patients with normal AUS findings after six cycles of NAC have few positive nodes than patients with suspicious findings (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Preoperative AUS is a potentially useful imaging modality to predict the pathologic status of the axillary within four cycles of NAC. Although the accuracy is lower for patients who completed six cycles of NAC than that who received four- and two- cycles, the number of positive lymph nodes for patients with normal findings on AUS is low.

Citing Articles

The circRNA-0001361/miR-491/FGFR4 axis is associated with axillary response evaluated by ultrasound following NAC in subjects with breast cancer.

Sun J, Li L, Chen X, Yang C, Wang L Biochem Biophys Rep. 2023; 34:101481.

PMID: 37250983 PMC: 10209698. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2023.101481.


Assessment of response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in carcinoma breast patients by high-frequency ultrasound.

Dighe S, Shinde R, Shinde S, Verma P J Family Med Prim Care. 2022; 11(8):4717-4722.

PMID: 36353032 PMC: 9638649. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2186_21.


Axillary ultrasonography combined with pre-operative wire localisation of clipped node in nodal restaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node positive breast cancer patients: a pilot study.

Pulappadi V, Paul S, Hari S, Dhamija E, Manchanda S, Kataria K Br J Radiol. 2021; 94(1127):20210788.

PMID: 34491822 PMC: 8553197. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210788.


Prediction of axillary response by monitoring with ultrasound and MRI during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Eun N, Son E, Gweon H, Kim J, Youk J Eur Radiol. 2019; 30(3):1460-1469.

PMID: 31802216 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06539-4.


Prediction of Advanced Axillary Lymph Node Metastases (ypN2-3) Using Breast MR imaging and PET/CT after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Patients.

Kim W, Lee S, Kim H, Chae Y, Jeong S, Jung J Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):3181.

PMID: 29453385 PMC: 5816592. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21554-z.

References
1.
Lee M, Gonzalez S, Lin H, Zhao X, Kiluk J, Laronga C . Prospective trial of breast MRI versus 2D and 3D ultrasound for evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22(9):2888-94. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4357-3. View

2.
Redden M, Fuhrman G . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2013; 93(2):493-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2013.01.006. View

3.
Liu Q, Wang C, Li P, Liu J, Huang G, Song S . The Role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in Assessing Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:3746232. PMC: 4770138. DOI: 10.1155/2016/3746232. View

4.
Alvarado R, Yi M, Le-Petross H, Gilcrease M, Mittendorf E, Bedrosian I . The role for sentinel lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients who present with node-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19(10):3177-84. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2484-2. View

5.
Reintgen M, Kerivan L, Reintgen E, Swaninathan S, Reintgen D . Breast Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: State of the Art: 2015. Clin Breast Cancer. 2016; 16(3):155-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.02.014. View