» Articles » PMID: 27847698

Intrathecal Midazolam As an Adjuvant in Pregnancy-Induced Hypertensive Patients Undergoing an Elective Caesarean Section: A Clinical Comparative Study

Overview
Journal Anesth Pain Med
Publisher Brieflands
Date 2016 Nov 17
PMID 27847698
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A pain-free postoperative period is essential following a caesarean section so new mothers may care for and bond with their neonates. Intrathecal adjuvants are often administered during this procedure to provide significant analgesia, but they may also have bothersome side effects. Intrathecal midazolam produces effective postoperative analgesia with no significant side effects.

Objectives: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was designed to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of intrathecal midazolam vs. plain bupivacaine as an adjunct to bupivacaine in pregnancy-induced hypertension patients scheduled for elective caesarean section.

Methods: Sixty patients diagnosed with pregnancy-induced hypertension on regular treatment who were scheduled for a caesarean section were randomly allocated into two groups: a control group (Group BC, n = 30) and a midazolam group (Group BM, n = 30). Both groups received 10 mg (2 mL) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Group BC received 0.4 mL of distilled water, while group BM received 0.4 mL (2 mg) of midazolam intrathecally. The duration of postoperative analgesia, analgesic requirements during the first 24 hours after surgery, onset times and durations of sensory and motor blocks, incidence of hypotension, vasopressor requirements, and side effects were recorded.

Results: Postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in the midazolam group compared to the control group (201.5 minutes vs. 357.6 minutes). The mean onset times of the sensory and motor blocks were significantly faster (P < 0.01) in the midazolam group compared to the control group. The mean times to attain the maximum sensory level and motor blocks were also significantly faster in the midazolam group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of hypotension was 6.6% in the midazolam group and 36.6% in the control group, which was highly significant. In addition, the number of patients with side effects was significantly lower in the midazolam group compared to the control group.

Conclusions: Intrathecal midazolam 2 mg provides significantly longer and effective postoperative analgesia with no side effects.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Fentanyl With Midazolam As Adjuvants to Levobupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Sections: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Yazhini S, Venkatraman R, Kandan K Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e64732.

PMID: 39156298 PMC: 11329330. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.64732.


Intrathecal Adjuvant Midazolam Versus Fentanyl With Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Post-operative Analgesia in Women Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy.

Nayak A, Ninave S, Tayade S, Tayade H Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e40565.

PMID: 37465806 PMC: 10351601. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40565.


PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations.

Roofthooft E, Joshi G, Rawal N, Van de Velde M Anaesthesia. 2020; 76(5):665-680.

PMID: 33370462 PMC: 8048441. DOI: 10.1111/anae.15339.


Nalbuphine versus Midazolam as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section.

Amin O, Ibrahem M, Salem D J Pain Res. 2020; 13:1369-1376.

PMID: 32606903 PMC: 7295533. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S242545.


Efficacy of Adding Midazolam to Bupivacaine for Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

El Kenany S, Elshehawi M, Farid A, Eid M Anesth Essays Res. 2019; 13(3):522-527.

PMID: 31602072 PMC: 6775853. DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_95_19.

References
1.
Ben-David B, Solomon E, Levin H, Admoni H, Goldik Z . Intrathecal fentanyl with small-dose dilute bupivacaine: better anesthesia without prolonging recovery. Anesth Analg. 1997; 85(3):560-5. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199709000-00014. View

2.
Faull R, Villiger J . Benzodiazepine receptors in the human spinal cord: a detailed anatomical and pharmacological study. Neuroscience. 1986; 17(3):791-802. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(86)90045-x. View

3.
Prakash S, Joshi N, Gogia A, Prakash S, Singh R . Analgesic efficacy of two doses of intrathecal midazolam with bupivacaine in patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006; 31(3):221-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.02.006. View

4.
Mittal G, Gupta K, Katyal S, Kaushal S . Randomised double-blind comparative study of dexmedetomidine and tramadol for post-spinal anaesthesia shivering. Indian J Anaesth. 2014; 58(3):257-62. PMC: 4090989. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.135031. View

5.
Bharti N, Madan R, Mohanty P, Kaul H . Intrathecal midazolam added to bupivacaine improves the duration and quality of spinal anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003; 47(9):1101-5. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00186.x. View