Comparable Composite Endpoints After HLA-matched and HLA-haploidentical Transplantation with Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Composite endpoints that not only encompass mortality and relapse, but other critical post-transplant events such as graft-versus-host disease, are being increasingly utilized to quantify survival without significant morbidity after allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation. High-dose, post-transplantation cyclophosphamide reduces severe graft-versus-host disease with allogeneic marrow transplantation, making composite endpoints after this management particularly interesting. We retrospectively analyzed 684 adults with hematologic malignancies who received T-cell-replete bone marrow grafts and cyclophosphamide after myeloablative HLA-matched related (n=192) or unrelated (n=120), or non-myeloablative HLA-haploidentical (n=372) donor transplantation. The median follow up was 4 (range, 0.02-11.4) years. Graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival was defined as the time after transplantation without grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease, chronic graft-versus-host disease requiring systemic treatment, relapse, or death. Chronic graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival was defined as the time after transplantation without moderate or severe chronic graft-versus-host disease, relapse, or death. One-year graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival and chronic graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival estimates were, respectively, 47% (95% CI: 41-55%) and 53% (95% CI: 46-61%) after myeloablative HLA-matched related, 42% (95% CI: 34-52%) and 52% (95% CI: 44-62%) after myeloablative HLA-matched unrelated, and 45% (95% CI: 40-50%) and 50% (95% CI: 45-55%) after non-myeloablative HLA-haploidentical donor transplantation. In multivariable models, there were no differences in graft-versus-host disease-free, or chronic graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival after either myeloablative HLA-matched unrelated or non-myeloablative HLA-haploidentical, compared with myeloablative HLA-matched related donor transplantation. Although limited by inclusion of dissimilar cohorts, we found that post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based platforms yield comparable composite endpoints across conditioning intensity, donor type, and HLA match.
Adoncecchi G, Kumar A, Mogili K, Faramand R, Liu H, Khimani F Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).
PMID: 39858092 PMC: 11763395. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020310.
Jin X, Yang Y, Chen X Ann Hematol. 2025; .
PMID: 39847115 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-025-06199-z.
Koh J, Lee M, Pham T, Heo B, Choi S, Lee S Blood Res. 2025; 60(1):5.
PMID: 39812969 PMC: 11735700. DOI: 10.1007/s44313-024-00049-z.
Yildirim M, Sayin S, Comert M, Safak Yilmaz E, Avcu F, Ural A Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2024; 18(3):227-239.
PMID: 39257713 PMC: 11381669. DOI: 10.18502/ijhoscr.v18i3.16103.
Hadjis A, McCurdy S Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1358668.
PMID: 38817602 PMC: 11137201. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1358668.