» Articles » PMID: 27843124

Evolution of Cell-to-Cell Variability in Stochastic, Controlled, Heteroplasmic MtDNA Populations

Overview
Journal Am J Hum Genet
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Genetics
Date 2016 Nov 16
PMID 27843124
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Populations of physiologically vital mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) molecules evolve in cells under control from the nucleus. The evolution of populations of mixed mtDNA types is complicated and poorly understood, and variability of these controlled admixtures plays a central role in the inheritance and onset of genetic disease. Here, we develop a mathematical theory describing the evolution of, and variability in, these stochastic populations for any type of cellular control, showing that cell-to-cell variability in mtDNA and mutant load inevitably increases with time, according to rates that we derive and which are notably independent of the mechanistic details of feedback signaling. We show with a set of experimental case studies that this theory explains disparate quantitative results from classical and modern experimental and computational research on heteroplasmy variance in different species. We demonstrate that our general model provides a host of specific insights, including a modification of the often-used but hard-to-interpret Wright formula to correspond directly to biological observables, the ability to quantify selective and mutational pressure in mtDNA populations, and characterization of the pronounced variability inevitably arising from the action of possible mtDNA quality-control mechanisms. Our general theoretical framework, supported by existing experimental results, thus helps us to understand and predict the evolution of stochastic mtDNA populations in cell biology.

Citing Articles

Evolution and maintenance of mtDNA gene content across eukaryotes.

Veeraragavan S, Johansen M, Johnston I Biochem J. 2024; 481(15):1015-1042.

PMID: 39101615 PMC: 11346449. DOI: 10.1042/BCJ20230415.


High-throughput single-cell analysis reveals progressive mitochondrial DNA mosaicism throughout life.

Glynos A, Bozhilova L, Frison M, Burr S, Stewart J, Chinnery P Sci Adv. 2023; 9(43):eadi4038.

PMID: 37878704 PMC: 10599618. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adi4038.


Tissue-specific heteroplasmy segregation is accompanied by a sharp mtDNA decline in soma.

Tsyba N, Feng G, Grub L, Held J, Strozak A, Burkewitz K iScience. 2023; 26(4):106349.

PMID: 36968071 PMC: 10031119. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106349.


Mitochondrial network structure controls cell-to-cell mtDNA variability generated by cell divisions.

Glastad R, Johnston I PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(3):e1010953.

PMID: 36952562 PMC: 10072490. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010953.


Stochastic survival of the densest and mitochondrial DNA clonal expansion in aging.

Insalata F, Hoitzing H, Aryaman J, Jones N Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(49):e2122073119.

PMID: 36442091 PMC: 9894218. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2122073119.


References
1.
Raj A, van Oudenaarden A . Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell. 2008; 135(2):216-26. PMC: 3118044. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.050. View

2.
Wai T, Teoli D, Shoubridge E . The mitochondrial DNA genetic bottleneck results from replication of a subpopulation of genomes. Nat Genet. 2008; 40(12):1484-8. DOI: 10.1038/ng.258. View

3.
Capps G, Samuels D, Chinnery P . A model of the nuclear control of mitochondrial DNA replication. J Theor Biol. 2003; 221(4):565-83. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2003.3207. View

4.
Johnston I, Burgstaller J, Havlicek V, Kolbe T, Rulicke T, Brem G . Stochastic modelling, Bayesian inference, and new in vivo measurements elucidate the debated mtDNA bottleneck mechanism. Elife. 2015; 4:e07464. PMC: 4486817. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.07464. View

5.
Pyle A, Taylor R, Durham S, Deschauer M, Schaefer A, Samuels D . Depletion of mitochondrial DNA in leucocytes harbouring the 3243A->G mtDNA mutation. J Med Genet. 2006; 44(1):69-74. PMC: 2597915. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2006.043109. View