» Articles » PMID: 27838156

Editor's Choice - Management of Secondary Aorto-enteric and Other Abdominal Arterio-enteric Fistulas: A Review and Pooled Data Analysis

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2016 Nov 14
PMID 27838156
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare management strategies for secondary abdominal arterio-enteric fistulas (AEFs).

Methods: This study is a review and pooled data analysis. Medline and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between 1999 and 2015. Particular emphasis was given to short- and long-term outcomes in relation to AEF repair type.

Results: Two hundred and sixteen publications were retrieved, reporting on 823 patients. In-hospital mortality was 30.7%. Open surgery had higher in-hospital mortality (246/725, 33.9%), than endovascular methods (7/98, 7.1%, p < .001, OR 6.7, 95% CI 3-14.7, including staged endovascular to open surgery, 0/13, 0%). In-hospital mortality after graft removal/extra-anatomical bypass grafting was 31.2% (66/226), graft removal/in situ repair 34% (137/403), primary closure of the arterial defect 62.5% (10/16), and for miscellaneous open procedures 41.3% (33/80), p = .019. Among the subgroups of in situ repair, homografts were associated with a higher mortality than impregnated prosthetic grafts (p = .047). There was no difference in recurrent AEF-free rates between open and endovascular procedures. Extra-anatomical bypass/graft removal and in situ repair had a lower AEF recurrence rate than primary closure and homografts. Late sepsis occurred more often after endovascular surgery (2-year rates 42% vs. 19% for open, p = .001). The early survival benefit of endovascular surgery was blunted during follow-up, although it remained significant (p < .001). Within the in situ repair group, impregnated prosthetic grafts were associated with the worst overall and AEF related mortality free rates and vein grafts with the best. No recurrence, sepsis, or mortality was reported following staged endograft placement to open repair after a mean follow-up of 16.8 months (p = .18, p = .22, and p = .006, respectively, compared with patients in other groups).

Conclusions: Endovascular surgery, where appropriate, is associated with better early survival than open surgery for secondary AEFs. Most of this benefit is lost during long-term follow-up, implying that a staged approach with early conversion to in situ vein grafting may achieve the best results in selected patients.

Citing Articles

Aortoduodenal Fistula With IgG4-Related Periaortitis: A Case Report.

Shizuku T, Yamaguchi H Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73193.

PMID: 39650910 PMC: 11624511. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73193.


Vascular graft infection with duodenal fistulization 10 years after hybrid endovascular aortic repair with renovisceral debranching: a case report.

Osada H, Yamazaki K, Takeda T, Minatoya K Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Cases. 2024; 2(1):83.

PMID: 39517091 PMC: 11533428. DOI: 10.1186/s44215-023-00087-6.


Two Cases of Primary Aortoenteric Fistulas Diagnosed by Computed Tomography.

Gregg A, Sly M, Williams T Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63406.

PMID: 39070467 PMC: 11283867. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63406.


Secondary aortoenteric fistula: a narrative review of the view of the surgeon.

Mulita F, Leivaditis V, Verras G, Pitros C, Dimopoulos P, Katsakiori P Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2024; 9:e66-e71.

PMID: 38846053 PMC: 11155463. DOI: 10.5114/amsad/186358.


Brazilian Society for Angiology and Vascular Surgery guidelines on abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Mulatti G, Joviliano E, Pereira A, Fioranelli A, Pereira A, Brito-Queiroz A J Vasc Bras. 2023; 22:e20230040.

PMID: 38021279 PMC: 10648059. DOI: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300402.