» Articles » PMID: 27834083

Molecular Diagnosis Using Residual Liquid-Based Cytology Materials for Patients with Nondiagnostic or Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2016 Nov 12
PMID 27834083
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Molecular analysis for common somatic mutations in thyroid cancer can improve diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the nondiagnostic or indeterminate category of thyroid nodules. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of molecular diagnosis from residual liquid-based cytology (LBC) material after cytological diagnosis.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled 53 patients with thyroid nodules diagnosed as nondiagnostic, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) after FNAC. DNAs and RNAs were isolated from residual LBC materials. BRAF(V600E) and RAS point mutations, PAX8/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), RET/PTC1, and RET/PTC3 rearrangements were evaluated by real-time polymerase chain reaction and pyrosequencing.

Results: All DNAs from 53 residual LBC samples could be analysed and point mutations were detected in 10 samples (19%). In 17 AUS nodules, seven samples (41%) had point mutations including BRAF (n=4), NRAS (n=2), and KRAS (n=1). In 20 FLUS nodules, three samples (15%) had NRAS point mutations. RNA from only one FLUS nodule could be analysed for rearrangements and there was no abnormality.

Conclusion: Molecular analysis for BRAF and RAS mutations was feasible in residual LBC materials and might be useful for diagnosis of indeterminate thyroid nodules.

Citing Articles

Gene Analysis Using Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens Predicts Therapeutic Responses and Prognosis in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

Itonaga M, Ashida R, Murata S, Yamashita Y, Hatamaru K, Tamura T Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(3).

PMID: 35158819 PMC: 8833456. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030551.


K-ras mutation analysis of residual liquid-based cytology specimens from endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration improves cell block diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Sekita-Hatakeyama Y, Nishikawa T, Takeuchi M, Morita K, Takeda M, Hatakeyama K PLoS One. 2018; 13(3):e0193692.

PMID: 29494669 PMC: 5832306. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193692.


Comparison of Immunohistochemistry and Direct Sanger Sequencing for Detection of the BRAF(V600E) Mutation in Thyroid Neoplasm.

Oh H, Kwon H, Park S, Kim M, Jeon M, Kim T Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2018; 33(1):62-69.

PMID: 29388401 PMC: 5874197. DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2018.33.1.62.


Articles in Endocrinology and Metabolism in 2016.

Lee W Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2017; 32(1):62-67.

PMID: 28345318 PMC: 5368124. DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2017.32.1.62.


Loss of c-KIT expression in thyroid cancer cells.

Franceschi S, Lessi F, Panebianco F, Tantillo E, La Ferla M, Menicagli M PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0173913.

PMID: 28301608 PMC: 5354407. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173913.

References
1.
Gilbert L, Oates E, Ratnam S . Stability of cervical specimens in SurePath medium for human papillomavirus testing with the Roche cobas 4800 assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2013; 51(10):3412-4. PMC: 3811638. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01391-13. View

2.
Xing M . BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid cancer: pathogenic role, molecular bases, and clinical implications. Endocr Rev. 2007; 28(7):742-62. DOI: 10.1210/er.2007-0007. View

3.
Michael C, McConnel J, Pecott J, Afify A, Al-Khafaji B . Comparison of ThinPrep and TriPath PREP liquid-based preparations in nongynecologic specimens: a pilot study. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001; 25(3):177-84. DOI: 10.1002/dc.2033. View

4.
Kim J . Molecular pathogenesis and targeted therapies in well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2014; 29(3):211-6. PMC: 4192816. DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2014.29.3.211. View

5.
Eszlinger M, Paschke R . Molecular fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of thyroid nodules by tumor specific mutations and gene expression patterns. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010; 322(1-2):29-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2010.01.010. View