» Articles » PMID: 27822652

Utility of Oropharyngeal Real-time PCR for S. Pneumoniae and H. Influenzae for Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Adults

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Nov 9
PMID 27822652
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A lack of sensitive tests and difficulties obtaining representative samples contribute to the challenge in identifying etiology in pneumonia. Upper respiratory tract swabs can be easily collected and analyzed with real-time PCR (rtPCR). Common pathogens such as S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae can both colonize and infect the respiratory tract, complicating the interpretation of positive results. Oropharyngeal swabs were collected (n = 239) prospectively from adults admitted to hospital with pneumonia. Analysis with rtPCR targeting S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae was performed and results compared with sputum cultures, blood cultures, and urine antigen testing for S. pneumoniae. Different Ct cutoff values were applied to positive tests to discern colonization from infection. Comparing rtPCR with conventional testing for S. pneumoniae in patients with all tests available (n = 57) resulted in: sensitivity 87 %, specificity 79 %, PPV 59 % and NPV 94 %, and for H. influenzae (n = 67): sensitivity 75 %, specificity 80 %, PPV 45 % and NPV 94 %. When patients with prior antimicrobial exposure were excluded sensitivity improved: 92 % for S. pneumoniae and 80 % for H. influenzae. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated for S. pneumoniae: AUC = 0.65 (95 % CI 0.51-0.80) and for H. influenzae: AUC = 0.86 (95 % CI 0.72-1.00). Analysis of oropharyngeal swabs using rtPCR proved both reasonably sensitive and specific for diagnosing pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. This method may be a useful diagnostic adjunct to other methods and of special value in patients unable to provide representative lower airway samples.

Citing Articles

Simultaneous Genetically Detection of , and in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Respiratory Infection.

Mohammadi Ebli F, Heshmatipour Z, Daneshjou K, Siadat S Iran J Pathol. 2023; 18(3):356-362.

PMID: 37942203 PMC: 10628374. DOI: 10.30699/ijp.2023.1991067.3075.


Diagnostic utility of oropharyngeal swabs as an alternative to lower respiratory tract samples for PCR-based syndromic testing in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Serigstad S, Knoop S, Markussen D, Ulvestad E, Bjorneklett R, Ebbesen M J Clin Microbiol. 2023; 61(9):e0050523.

PMID: 37585220 PMC: 10512787. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00505-23.


Pneumococcal concentration and serotype distribution in preschool children with radiologically confirmed pneumonia compared to healthy controls prior to introduction of pneumococcal vaccination in Zanzibar: an observational study.

Elfving K, Stromberg L, Geravandi S, Andersson M, Bachelard M, Msellem M BMC Infect Dis. 2022; 22(1):925.

PMID: 36496395 PMC: 9737767. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07902-5.


Clinical sign and biomarker-based algorithm to identify bacterial pneumonia among outpatients with lower respiratory tract infection in Tanzania.

Hogendoorn S, Lhopitallier L, Richard-Greenblatt M, Tenisch E, Mbarack Z, Samaka J BMC Infect Dis. 2022; 22(1):39.

PMID: 34991507 PMC: 8735728. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06994-9.


Gram-Positive Pneumonia: Possibilities Offered by Phage Therapy.

Fernandez L, Cima-Cabal M, Duarte A, Rodriguez A, Del Mar Garcia-Suarez M, Garcia P Antibiotics (Basel). 2021; 10(8).

PMID: 34439050 PMC: 8388979. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10081000.


References
1.
Charles P, Whitby M, Fuller A, Stirling R, Wright A, Korman T . The etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in Australia: why penicillin plus doxycycline or a macrolide is the most appropriate therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 46(10):1513-21. DOI: 10.1086/586749. View

2.
Fine M, Auble T, Yealy D, Hanusa B, Weissfeld L, Singer D . A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336(4):243-50. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199701233360402. View

3.
Gunnarsson R, Holm S, Soderstrom M . The prevalence of potential pathogenic bacteria in nasopharyngeal samples from healthy children and adults. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1998; 16(1):13-7. DOI: 10.1080/028134398750003340. View

4.
Stralin K, Tornqvist E, Kaltoft M, Olcen P, Holmberg H . Etiologic diagnosis of adult bacterial pneumonia by culture and PCR applied to respiratory tract samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(2):643-5. PMC: 1392682. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.44.2.643-645.2006. View

5.
Lieberman D, Shleyfer E, Castel H, Terry A, Harman-Boehm I, Delgado J . Nasopharyngeal versus oropharyngeal sampling for isolation of potential respiratory pathogens in adults. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(2):525-8. PMC: 1392694. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.44.2.525-528.2006. View