» Articles » PMID: 27821179

The Clinicopathological Significance of Angiogenesis in Hindgut Neuroendocrine Tumors Obtained Via an Endoscopic Procedure

Overview
Journal Diagn Pathol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Pathology
Date 2016 Nov 9
PMID 27821179
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: As the World Health Organization grading system for gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) may not always correlate with tumor progression, it is imperative that other independent predictors of tumor progression be established. To identify such predictors, we conducted a retrospective histopathological study of hindgut NETs, obtained from endoscopic procedures, and used statistical analyses to evaluate predictive factors.

Methods: We first obtained clinicopathological data of cases of hindgut NETs. Tissue sections from tumor samples were prepared and subjected to pathological examination. In particular, we calculated the microvessel density (MVD) and lymphatic microvessel density (LMVD) values, and performed appropriate statistical analyses.

Results: A total of 42 cases of hindgut NETs were selected for the study, 41 from the rectum and 1 from the sigmoid colon. Based on the Ki-67 labeling index, 34 cases were classified as NET G1 tumors and 8 as NET G2 tumors. MVD values ranged from 1.4/mm to 73.9/mm and LMVD values from 0/mm to 22.9/mm. MVD and LMVD were identified as risk factors for venous and lymphatic invasion of hindgut NETs. Moreover, MVD positively correlated with the maximum diameter of the tumor.

Conclusions: Tumor progression of NETs may cause angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, via an unknown mechanism, as well as lymphovascular invasion. Angiogenesis likely plays an important role in occurrence and progression in the initial phase of hindgut NETs.

Citing Articles

The Potential of Spent Coffee Grounds in Functional Food Development.

Bevilacqua E, Cruzat V, Singh I, RoseMeyer R, Panchal S, Brown L Nutrients. 2023; 15(4).

PMID: 36839353 PMC: 9963703. DOI: 10.3390/nu15040994.


Cafestol and Kahweol: A Review on Their Bioactivities and Pharmacological Properties.

Ren Y, Wang C, Xu J, Wang S Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(17).

PMID: 31480213 PMC: 6747192. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20174238.


Surgical resection of the primary tumor leads to prolonged survival in metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Feng T, Lv W, Yuan M, Shi Z, Zhong H, Ling S World J Surg Oncol. 2019; 17(1):54.

PMID: 30898132 PMC: 6429809. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1597-5.


Clinical outcomes of patients with G1/G2 neuroendocrine tumors arising from foregut or hindgut treated with somatostatin analogs: a retrospective study.

Ida H, Honma Y, Hirano H, Shoji H, Iwasa S, Okita N Invest New Drugs. 2018; 37(3):573-578.

PMID: 30267338 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-018-0669-7.


Diagnosis, Pathological Findings, and Clinical Management of Gangliocytic Paraganglioma: A Systematic Review.

Okubo Y, Yoshioka E, Suzuki M, Washimi K, Kawachi K, Kameda Y Front Oncol. 2018; 8:291.

PMID: 30101131 PMC: 6072869. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00291.


References
1.
Nemoto D, Hayashi Y, Utano K, Isohata N, Endo S, Lefor A . A novel retrieval technique for large colorectal tumors resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection: tumor extraction by defecation. Endosc Int Open. 2016; 4(1):E93-5. PMC: 4713179. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-107902. View

2.
Zimmermann M, Bosman F . Proliferative activity of well differentiated neuroendocrine tumours of the gut. Histol Histopathol. 2003; 18(2):353-8. DOI: 10.14670/HH-18.353. View

3.
Oberg K, Castellano D . Current knowledge on diagnosis and staging of neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2011; 30 Suppl 1:3-7. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-011-9292-1. View

4.
Schoppmann S, Bayer G, Aumayr K, Taucher S, Geleff S, Rudas M . Prognostic value of lymphangiogenesis and lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2):306-12. PMC: 1356408. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133355.48672.22. View

5.
Stinner B, Rothmund M . Neuroendocrine tumours (carcinoids) of the appendix. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2005; 19(5):729-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2005.06.003. View