» Articles » PMID: 27819524

Presentation Matters: Buffers, Packaging, and Delivery Devices for New, Oral Enteric Vaccines for Infants

Overview
Date 2016 Nov 8
PMID 27819524
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Oral administration of vaccines is simpler and more acceptable than injection via needle and syringe, particularly for infants (Fig. 1) This route is promising for new vaccines in development against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) and Shigella that cause childhood diarrhea with devastating consequences in low-resource countries. However, vaccine antigens and adjuvants given orally need buffering against the degradative effects of low stomach pH, and the type and volume of antacid buffer require special attention for infants. In addition, container/closure systems must be compatible with vaccine formulations, protect against water and gas transfer, and have minimal impact on the cold chain. Health care workers in demanding low-resource settings need an administration device that is easy to use, yet will accurately measure and safely deliver the correct vaccine dose. Developers must consider manufacturing capabilities, and immunization program managers want affordable vaccines. As new combination enteric vaccine candidates advance into clinical evaluation, features of the final vaccine presentation-liquid or dry format, diluent, buffer, primary and secondary packaging, and administration device-should be taken into account early in product development to achieve the greatest possible impact for the vaccine.

Citing Articles

Vaccines for Protecting Infants from Bacterial Causes of Diarrheal Disease.

Walker R, Kaminski R, Porter C, Choy R, White J, Fleckenstein J Microorganisms. 2021; 9(7).

PMID: 34202102 PMC: 8303436. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9071382.


Cost of goods sold and total cost of delivery for oral and parenteral vaccine packaging formats.

Sedita J, Perrella S, Morio M, Berbari M, Hsu J, Saxon E Vaccine. 2018; 36(12):1700-1709.

PMID: 29449099 PMC: 5844852. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.011.


Preformulation studies with the Escherichia coli double mutant heat-labile toxin adjuvant for use in an oral vaccine.

White J, Haghighi C, Brunner J, Estrada M, Lal M, Chen D J Immunol Methods. 2017; 451:83-89.

PMID: 28939395 PMC: 5703769. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2017.09.003.

References
1.
Mvundura M, Lorenson K, Chweya A, Kigadye R, Bartholomew K, Makame M . Estimating the costs of the vaccine supply chain and service delivery for selected districts in Kenya and Tanzania. Vaccine. 2015; 33(23):2697-703. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.03.084. View

2.
Resik S, Tejeda A, Mas Lago P, Diaz M, Carmenates A, Sarmiento L . Randomized controlled clinical trial of fractional doses of inactivated poliovirus vaccine administered intradermally by needle-free device in Cuba. J Infect Dis. 2010; 201(9):1344-52. DOI: 10.1086/651611. View

3.
Dougan G, Huett A, Clare S . Vaccines against human enteric bacterial pathogens. Br Med Bull. 2002; 62:113-23. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/62.1.113. View

4.
Venkatesan M, Van De Verg L . Combination vaccines against diarrheal diseases. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015; 11(6):1434-48. PMC: 4517455. DOI: 10.4161/21645515.2014.986984. View

5.
Lagos R, San Martin O, Wasserman S, Prado V, Losonsky G, Bustamante C . Palatability, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of engineered live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in Chilean infants and toddlers. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999; 18(7):624-30. DOI: 10.1097/00006454-199907000-00011. View