» Articles » PMID: 27815705

Neural, Biomechanical, and Physiological Factors Involved in Sex-related Differences in the Maximal Rate of Isometric Torque Development

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2016 Nov 6
PMID 27815705
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Recent research has reported that lower maximal rate of torque development (dτ/dt ) exhibited by females, relative to males, during knee extension can be accounted for by normalization to a maximal voluntary contraction (MVC); however, this was not seen in the upper limb.

Purpose: The aim of the current work was to examine the contribution of maximum strength (τ), twitch contraction time (CT), muscle fiber condition velocity (MFCV), and rate of muscle activation (Q) to sex-differences in the dτ/dt during maximal isometric dorsiflexion.

Methods: Thirty-eight participants (20 males; 18 females) performed both maximal voluntary and evoked isometric contractions of the tibialis anterior across 3 days. Ten maximal compound muscle action potentials were elicited and subsequently followed by three, 5-s contractions. From the recordings, MFCV, dτ/dt , τ, CT, electromechanical delay (EMD), root-mean squared (RMS) amplitude, peak-to-peak voltage (Vpp), and Q were calculated.

Results: An ANCOVA showed that τ accounted for all the sex-differences in dτ/dt (p = 0.96). There were no significant differences between groups with respect to MFCV, RMS amplitude, Vpp amplitude, or CT. However, there was a significant sex-difference in dτ/dt , τ, and Q. Females had longer evoked EMD times compared with males (15.69 ± 10.57 ms versus 9.95 ± 3.46 ms; p = 0.01), but the voluntary EMD times were not different.

Conclusion: The current research supports the work by Hannah et al. Exp Physiol 97:618-629, (2012) that normalization to MVC in the quadriceps is able to account for all sex-differences in rate of toque development in the lower limb.

Citing Articles

Sex Differences in Knee Extensor Neuromuscular Function in Individuals With and Without Patellofemoral Pain.

Kim S, Glaviano N, Park J Sports Health. 2023; 16(6):1000-1008.

PMID: 37978417 PMC: 11531066. DOI: 10.1177/19417381231209318.


Teaching Essential EMG Theory to Kinesiologists and Physical Therapists Using Analogies Visual Descriptions, and Qualitative Analysis of Biophysical Concepts.

Gabriel D Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(17).

PMID: 36081014 PMC: 9460425. DOI: 10.3390/s22176555.


Measures of motor segmentation from rapid isometric force pulses are reliable and differentiate Parkinson's disease from age-related slowing.

Howard S, Grenet D, Bellumori M, Knight C Exp Brain Res. 2022; 240(7-8):2205-2217.

PMID: 35768733 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06398-4.


Role of Knee and Ankle Extensors' Muscle-Tendon Properties in Dynamic Balance Recovery from a Simulated Slip.

Debelle H, Maganaris C, OBrien T Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(9).

PMID: 35591172 PMC: 9104373. DOI: 10.3390/s22093483.


Neuromuscular recruitment strategies of the vastus lateralis according to sex.

Guo Y, Jones E, Inns T, Ely I, Stashuk D, Wilkinson D Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2022; 235(2):e13803.

PMID: 35184382 PMC: 9286427. DOI: 10.1111/apha.13803.


References
1.
Gabriel D, Boucher J . Effects of repetitive dynamic contractions upon electromechanical delay. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999; 79(1):37-40. DOI: 10.1007/s004210050470. View

2.
Rozzi S, Lephart S, Gear W, Fu F . Knee joint laxity and neuromuscular characteristics of male and female soccer and basketball players. Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27(3):312-9. DOI: 10.1177/03635465990270030801. View

3.
Wilkerson R, Mason M . Differences in men's and women's mean ankle ligamentous laxity. Iowa Orthop J. 2000; 20:46-8. PMC: 1888743. View

4.
Gabriel D, Basford J, An K . Training-related changes in the maximal rate of torque development and EMG activity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2001; 11(2):123-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00041-9. View

5.
Paasuke M, Ereline J, Gapeyeva H . Knee extension strength and vertical jumping performance in nordic combined athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2001; 41(3):354-61. View