» Articles » PMID: 27810657

Interrelationships Between Marijuana Demand and Discounting of Delayed Rewards: Convergence in Behavioral Economic Methods

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2016 Nov 7
PMID 27810657
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Distinct behavioral economic domains, including high perceived drug value (demand) and delay discounting (DD), have been implicated in the initiation of drug use and the progression to dependence. However, it is unclear whether frequent marijuana users conform to a "reinforcer pathology" addiction model wherein marijuana demand and DD jointly increase risk for problematic marijuana use and cannabis dependence (CD).

Methods: Participants (n=88, 34% female, 14% cannabis dependent) completed a marijuana purchase task at baseline. A delay discounting task was completed following placebo marijuana cigarette (0% THC) administration during a separate experimental session.

Results: Marijuana demand and DD were quantified using area under the curve (AUC). In multiple regression models, demand uniquely predicted frequency of marijuana use while DD did not. In contrast, DD uniquely predicted CD symptom count while demand did not. There were no significant interactions between demand and DD in either model.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that frequent marijuana users exhibit key constituents of the reinforcer pathology model: high marijuana demand and steep discounting of delayed rewards. However, demand and DD appear to be independent rather than synergistic risk factors for elevated marijuana use and risk for progression to CD. Findings also provide support for using AUC as a singular marijuana demand metric, particularly when also examining other behavioral economic constructs that apply similar statistical approaches, such as DD, to support analytic methodological convergence.

Citing Articles

Acute Stress Effect on Delay Discounting and Cannabis Demand Among Individuals Endorsing High-Frequency Cannabis Use.

Chang Y, Rubey R, Ladd B Cannabis. 2025; 8(1):21-39.

PMID: 39968482 PMC: 11831905. DOI: 10.26828/cannabis/2024/000275.


Longitudinal Pathways From Maltreatment to Substance Use Through Delay Discounting During Adolescence and Into Young Adulthood.

Peviani K, Clinchard C, Bickel W, Casas B, Kim-Spoon J JAACAP Open. 2024; 2(4):239-249.

PMID: 39697391 PMC: 11650661. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.02.003.


Designing and Validating a Novel Method for Assessing Delay Discounting Associated With Health Behaviors: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

Luken A, Rabinowitz J, Wells J, Sosnowski D, Strickland J, Thrul J JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e48954.

PMID: 38412027 PMC: 10933719. DOI: 10.2196/48954.


Reliability and validity of behavioral-economic measures: A review and synthesis of discounting and demand.

Miller B, Reed D, Amlung M J Exp Anal Behav. 2023; 120(2):263-280.

PMID: 37248719 PMC: 10524652. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.860.


Mechanisms of impulsive choice: Experiments to explore and models to map the empirical terrain.

Smith T, Southern R, Kirkpatrick K Learn Behav. 2023; 51(4):355-391.

PMID: 36913144 PMC: 10497727. DOI: 10.3758/s13420-023-00577-1.


References
1.
Johnson M, Bickel W, Baker F . Moderate drug use and delay discounting: a comparison of heavy, light, and never smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007; 15(2):187-94. DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.15.2.187. View

2.
Kollins S . Delay discounting is associated with substance use in college students. Addict Behav. 2003; 28(6):1167-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(02)00220-4. View

3.
MacKillop J, Murphy J, Ray L, Eisenberg D, Lisman S, Lum J . Further validation of a cigarette purchase task for assessing the relative reinforcing efficacy of nicotine in college smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008; 16(1):57-65. DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.16.1.57. View

4.
de Wit H . Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol. 2008; 14(1):22-31. PMC: 3640851. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00129.x. View

5.
Teeters J, Murphy J . The behavioral economics of driving after drinking among college drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015; 39(5):896-904. DOI: 10.1111/acer.12695. View