» Articles » PMID: 27807397

Risk Factors for Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis

Overview
Journal JSLS
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2016 Nov 4
PMID 27807397
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Factors that contribute to difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in acute cholecystitis (AC) that would affect the performance of early surgery remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify such risk factors.

Methods: One hundred fifty-four patients who underwent LC for AC were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were categorized into early surgery and delayed surgery. Factors predicting difficult LC were analyzed for each group. The operation time, bleeding, and cases of difficult laparoscopic surgery (CDLS)/conversion rate were analyzed as an index of difficulty. Analyses of patients in the early group were especially focused on 3 consecutive histopathological phases: edematous cholecystitis (E), necrotizing cholecystitis (N), suppurative/subacute cholecystitis (S).

Results: In the early group, the CDLS/conversion rate was highest in necrotizing cholecystitis. Its rate was significantly higher than that of the other 2 histopathological types (N 27.9% vs E and S 7.4%; = .037). In the delayed-surgery group, a higher white blood cell (WBC) count and older age showed significant correlations with the CDLS/conversion rate ( = .034 and = .004).

Conclusion: In early surgery, histopathologic necrotizing cholecystitis is a risk factor for difficult LC in AC. A higher WBC count and older age are risk factors for delayed surgery.

Citing Articles

Preoperative predictors of difficult early laparoscopic cholecystectomy among patients with acute calculous cholecystitis in Egypt.

Korayem I, Bessa S BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):329.

PMID: 39449024 PMC: 11515539. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02532-x.


Predictive Factors for Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies in Acute Cholecystitis.

Stoica P, Serban D, Bratu D, Serboiu C, Costea D, Tribus L Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38337862 PMC: 10855974. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14030346.


Management of Intra-Abdominal Infections: The Role of Procalcitonin.

Tian B, Agnoletti V, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, Bravi F, Sartelli M Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(9).

PMID: 37760703 PMC: 10525176. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12091406.


Learning curve of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a risk-adjusted cumulative summation (RA-CUSUM) analysis of six general surgery residents.

Lombardi P, Mazzola M, Veronesi V, Granieri S, Cioffi S, Baia M Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(10):8133-8143.

PMID: 37684403 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10345-x.


Risk factors for patient selection in ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A Single-centre experience.

Wu Q, Fu N, Chen W, Jin X, He L, Mo C J Minim Access Surg. 2022; 18(2):302-307.

PMID: 35313439 PMC: 8973494. DOI: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_25_21.


References
1.
Bennett G, Rusinek H, Lisi V, Israel G, Krinsky G, Slywotzky C . CT findings in acute gangrenous cholecystitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178(2):275-81. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.178.2.1780275. View

2.
Sakpal S, Bindra S, Chamberlain R . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates two decades later. JSLS. 2011; 14(4):476-483. PMC: 3083035. DOI: 10.4293/108680810X12924466007926. View

3.
Ambe P, Weber S, Christ H, Wassenberg D . Cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. How time-critical are the so called "golden 72 hours"? Or better "golden 24 hours" and "silver 25-72 hour"? A case control study. World J Emerg Surg. 2014; 9(1):60. PMC: 4274710. DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-60. View

4.
Kuwabara J, Watanabe Y, Kameoka K, Horiuchi A, Sato K, Yukumi S . Usefulness of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy with operative cholangiography for severe cholecystitis. Surg Today. 2013; 44(3):462-5. PMC: 3923106. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-013-0626-1. View

5.
Zhu B, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Gong K, Lu Y, Zhang N . Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within and beyond 72 h of symptom onset during emergency admissions. World J Surg. 2012; 36(11):2654-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1709-7. View