Peer-Generated Health Information: The Role of Online Communities in Patient and Caregiver Health Decisions

Overview

Journal J Health Commun

Specialties Health Services
Public Health

Date 2016 Nov 3

PMID 27805496

Citations 11

Authors

Douglas J Rupert

Jennifer Gard Read

Jacqueline B Amoozegar

Rebecca R Moultrie

Olivia M Taylor

Amie C ODonoghue

Helen W Sullivan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Individuals increasingly access peer-generated health information (PGHI) through social media, especially online health communities (OHCs). Previous research has documented PGHI topics, credibility assessment strategies, and PGHI's connection with well-being. However, there is limited evidence on where, when, and why individuals seek PGHI and how they use PGHI in health decisions. We conducted in-person and online focus groups with verified OHC members (N = 89)-representing 50 different medical conditions and 77 OHCs-to explore these topics. Two researchers independently coded transcripts with NVivo 9.2 and thematically analyzed responses. Most individuals accidentally discovered PGHI during Web searches rather than intentionally seeking it. Individuals valued PGHI primarily as an alternative information source about treatment options, self-care activities, and health care provider questions rather than a source of emotional support, and they acknowledged PGHI's limitation as anecdotal evidence. Individuals used PGHI as a springboard for additional research and patient-provider discussions, ultimately making treatment decisions alongside providers. These findings suggest that individuals use PGHI in much the same way they use traditional online health information and that PGHI facilitates, rather than obstructs, shared decision making with health care providers.

Citing Articles

Improving Social Media-Based Support Groups for the Rare Disease Community: Interview Study With Patients and Parents of Children with Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases.

Doyle T, Vershaw S, Conboy E, Halverson C JMIR Hum Factors. 2025; 11():e57833.

PMID: 39752188 PMC: 11730222. DOI: 10.2196/57833.

mHealth Apps for Dementia Caregivers: Systematic Examination of Mobile Apps.

Zou N, Xie B, He D, Hilsabeck R, Aguirre A JMIR Aging. 2024; 7:e58517.

PMID: 39621936 PMC: 11617330. DOI: 10.2196/58517.

Accuracy, Quality, and Misinformation of YouTube Abortion Procedural Videos: Cross-Sectional Study.

Acero N, Herrero E, Foncham J, McIlvaine J, Kayaalp E, Figueora M J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e50099.

PMID: 39437380 PMC: 11538871. DOI: 10.2196/50099.

A multi-site intervention using influencers to communicate about syringe service programmes.

Bonnevie E, Silesky M, Goldbarg J, Gudmundsen C, Fields M, Smyser J Health Educ J. 2024; 82(7):779-791.

PMID: 38650842 PMC: 11034740. DOI: 10.1177/00178969231197623.

The "Loci" of Misinformation and Its Correction in Peer- and Expert-Led Online Communities for Mental Health: Content Analysis.

Bizzotto N, Schulz P, de Bruijn G J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e44656.

PMID: 37721800 PMC: 10546261. DOI: 10.2196/44656.

References

Wicks P, Keininger D, Massagli M, de la Loge C, Brownstein C, Isojarvi J . Perceived benefits of sharing health data between people with epilepsy on an online platform. Epilepsy Behav. 2011; 23(1):16-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.09.026. View

Berland G, Elliott M, Morales L, Algazy J, Kravitz R, Broder M . Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA. 2001; 285(20):2612-21. PMC: 4182102. DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.20.2612. View

McMullan M . Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 63(1-2):24-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006. View

Dutta M, Feng H . Health orientation and disease state as predictors of online health support group use. Health Commun. 2007; 22(2):181-9. DOI: 10.1080/10410230701310323. View

An L, Schillo B, Saul J, Wendling A, Klatt C, Berg C . Utilization of smoking cessation informational, interactive, and online community resources as predictors of abstinence: cohort study. J Med Internet Res. 2008; 10(5):e55. PMC: 2630836. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1018. View

Kim B, Wallington S, Makambi K, Adams-Campbell L . Social networks and physical activity behaviors among cancer survivors: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey. J Health Commun. 2015; 20(6):656-62. PMC: 4507504. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018576. View

Frost J, Massagli M . Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another's data. J Med Internet Res. 2008; 10(3):e15. PMC: 2553248. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1053. View

Jackson C, Cheater F, Reid I . A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions. Health Expect. 2008; 11(3):232-51. PMC: 5060453. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00496.x. View

Tates K, Zwaanswijk M, Otten R, van Dulmen S, Hoogerbrugge P, Kamps W . Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009; 9:15. PMC: 2653071. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-15. View

10.

Wang Z, Walther J, Pingree S, Hawkins R . Health information, credibility, homophily, and influence via the Internet: Web sites versus discussion groups. Health Commun. 2008; 23(4):358-68. DOI: 10.1080/10410230802229738. View

11.

Brunson E . The impact of social networks on parents' vaccination decisions. Pediatrics. 2013; 131(5):e1397-404. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-2452. View

12.

Lee S, Hawkins R . Why do patients seek an alternative channel? The effects of unmet needs on patients' health-related Internet use. J Health Commun. 2010; 15(2):152-66. DOI: 10.1080/10810730903528033. View

13.

Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T . Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44(5):681-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3. View

14.

Chung J . Social networking in online support groups for health: how online social networking benefits patients. J Health Commun. 2013; 19(6):639-59. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2012.757396. View

15.

Tustin N . The role of patient satisfaction in online health information seeking. J Health Commun. 2010; 15(1):3-17. DOI: 10.1080/10810730903465491. View

16.

Macias W, McMillan S . The return of the house call: the role of internet-based interactivity in bringing health information home to older adults. Health Commun. 2008; 23(1):34-44. DOI: 10.1080/10410230701805174. View

17.

Banfield M, Barney L, Griffiths K, Christensen H . Australian mental health consumers' priorities for research: qualitative findings from the SCOPE for Research project. Health Expect. 2012; 17(3):365-75. PMC: 5060732. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00763.x. View

18.

Wagner T, Baker L, Bundorf M, Singer S . Use of the Internet for health information by the chronically ill. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005; 1(4):A13. PMC: 1277953. View

19.

Lee C . Does the internet displace health professionals?. J Health Commun. 2008; 13(5):450-64. DOI: 10.1080/10810730802198839. View

20.

Baker L, Wagner T, Singer S, Bundorf M . Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA. 2003; 289(18):2400-6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.18.2400. View