» Articles » PMID: 27804272

How Strongly Does Appetite Counter Weight Loss? Quantification of the Feedback Control of Human Energy Intake

Overview
Date 2016 Nov 3
PMID 27804272
Citations 88
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To quantify the feedback control of energy intake in response to long-term covert manipulation of energy balance in free-living humans.

Methods: A validated mathematical method was used to calculate energy intake changes during a 52-week placebo-controlled trial in 153 patients treated with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter inhibitor that increases urinary glucose excretion, thereby resulting in weight loss without patients being directly aware of the energy deficit. The relationship between the body weight time course and the calculated energy intake changes was analyzed using principles from engineering control theory.

Results: It was discovered that weight loss leads to a proportional increase in appetite resulting in eating above baseline by ∼100 kcal/day per kilogram of lost weight-an amount more than threefold larger than the corresponding energy expenditure adaptations.

Conclusions: While energy expenditure adaptations have often been considered the main reason for slowing of weight loss and subsequent regain, feedback control of energy intake plays an even larger role and helps explain why long-term maintenance of a reduced body weight is so difficult.

Citing Articles

Obesity and Metabolic Disease Impair the Anabolic Response to Protein Supplementation and Resistance Exercise: A Retrospective Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial with Implications for Aging, Sarcopenic Obesity, and Weight Management.

Nilsson M, Xhuti D, de Maat N, Hettinga B, Tarnopolsky M Nutrients. 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39771028 PMC: 11677392. DOI: 10.3390/nu16244407.


Effects of 12 and 24 Weeks of Interdisciplinary Interventions on Health-Related Physical Fitness, Biochemical Markers, and Level of Food Processing in Overweight or Obese Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study.

Dos Santos Moraes L, Santos N, Marques D, Marques M, Lalucci M, Perli V Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(11).

PMID: 39595673 PMC: 11593630. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21111406.


Real-World Clinical Effectiveness of Liraglutide for Weight Management in Türkiye: Insights from the LIRA-TR Study.

Oral A, Kucuk C, Kose M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458071 PMC: 11508960. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206121.


Evolving Approaches for Pharmacological Therapy of Obesity.

Chao A, Taylor S, Moore M, Amaro A, Wadden T Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2024; 65(1):169-189.

PMID: 39348522 PMC: 11770897. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-031124-101146.


Comparison of canagliflozin and teneligliptin on energy intake and body weight in Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes: a subanalysis of the CANTABILE study.

Isogawa M, Makino H, Son C, Nishimura K, Hirata T, Kasama S BMC Endocr Disord. 2024; 24(1):153.

PMID: 39160513 PMC: 11331643. DOI: 10.1186/s12902-024-01690-6.


References
1.
Almiron-Roig E, Palla L, Guest K, Ricchiuti C, Vint N, Jebb S . Factors that determine energy compensation: a systematic review of preload studies. Nutr Rev. 2013; 71(7):458-73. PMC: 3746122. DOI: 10.1111/nure.12048. View

2.
Schoeller D . How accurate is self-reported dietary energy intake?. Nutr Rev. 1990; 48(10):373-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1990.tb02882.x. View

3.
Stubbs R, Ritz P, Coward W, Prentice A . Covert manipulation of the ratio of dietary fat to carbohydrate and energy density: effect on food intake and energy balance in free-living men eating ad libitum. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995; 62(2):330-7. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/62.2.330. View

4.
Franz M, VanWormer J, Crain A, Boucher J, Histon T, Caplan W . Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007; 107(10):1755-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.07.017. View

5.
MacLean P, Bergouignan A, Cornier M, Jackman M . Biology's response to dieting: the impetus for weight regain. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011; 301(3):R581-600. PMC: 3174765. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00755.2010. View