Preferred Gait and Walk-run Transition Speeds in Ostriches Measured Using GPS-IMU Sensors
Overview
Affiliations
The ostrich (Struthio camelus) is widely appreciated as a fast and agile bipedal athlete, and is a useful comparative bipedal model for human locomotion. Here, we used GPS-IMU sensors to measure naturally selected gait dynamics of ostriches roaming freely over a wide range of speeds in an open field and developed a quantitative method for distinguishing walking and running using accelerometry. We compared freely selected gait-speed distributions with previous laboratory measures of gait dynamics and energetics. We also measured the walk-run and run-walk transition speeds and compared them with those reported for humans. We found that ostriches prefer to walk remarkably slowly, with a narrow walking speed distribution consistent with minimizing cost of transport (CoT) according to a rigid-legged walking model. The dimensionless speeds of the walk-run and run-walk transitions are slower than those observed in humans. Unlike humans, ostriches transition to a run well below the mechanical limit necessitating an aerial phase, as predicted by a compass-gait walking model. When running, ostriches use a broad speed distribution, consistent with previous observations that ostriches are relatively economical runners and have a flat curve for CoT against speed. In contrast, horses exhibit U-shaped curves for CoT against speed, with a narrow speed range within each gait for minimizing CoT. Overall, the gait dynamics of ostriches moving freely over natural terrain are consistent with previous lab-based measures of locomotion. Nonetheless, ostriches, like humans, exhibit a gait-transition hysteresis that is not explained by steady-state locomotor dynamics and energetics. Further study is required to understand the dynamics of gait transitions.
Muscle-controlled physics simulations of bird locomotion resolve the grounded running paradox.
van Bijlert P, van Soest A, Schulp A, Bates K Sci Adv. 2024; 10(39):eado0936.
PMID: 39321289 PMC: 11423892. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ado0936.
Pearce J, Chang Y, Xia D, Abeyesinghe S Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(13).
PMID: 38998070 PMC: 11240663. DOI: 10.3390/ani14131957.
Malaya C, Parikh P, Smith D, Riaz A, Chandrasekaran S, Layne C Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1141015.
PMID: 37362436 PMC: 10285399. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1141015.
Marmol-Guijarro A, Nudds R, Folkow L, Lees J, Codd J Polar Biol. 2021; 44(6):1141-1152.
PMID: 34720374 PMC: 8550507. DOI: 10.1007/s00300-021-02872-x.
Bishop P, Falisse A, De Groote F, Hutchinson J Sci Adv. 2021; 7(39):eabi7348.
PMID: 34550734 PMC: 8457660. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abi7348.