Biofeedback in Partial Weight Bearing: Usability of Two Different Devices from a Patient's and Physical Therapist's Perspective

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2016 Nov 1

PMID 27798674

Citations 8

Authors

Remko van Lieshout

Martijn F Pisters

Benedicte Vanwanseele

Rob A de Bie

Eveline J Wouters

Mirelle J Stukstette

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Partial weight bearing is frequently instructed by physical therapists in patients after lower-limb trauma or surgery. The use of biofeedback devices seems promising to improve the patient's compliance with weight-bearing instructions. SmartStep and OpenGo-Science are biofeedback devices that provide real-time feedback. For a successful implementation, usability of the devices is a critical aspect and should be tested from a user's perspective.

Aim: To describe the usability from the physical therapists' and a patients' perspective of Smartstep and OpenGo-Science to provide feedback on partial weight bearing during supervised rehabilitation of patients after lower-limb trauma or surgery.

Methods: In a convergent mixed-methods design, qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Usability was subdivided into user performance, satisfaction and acceptability. Patients prescribed with partial weight bearing and their physical therapists were asked to use SmartStep and OpenGo-Science during supervised rehabilitation. Usability was qualitatively tested by a think-aloud method and a semi-structured interview and quantitatively tested by the System-Usability-Scale (SUS) and closed questions. For the qualitative data thematic content analyses were used.

Results: Nine pairs of physical therapists and their patients participated. The mean SUS scores for patients and physical therapists were for SmartStep 70 and 53, and for OpenGo-Science 79 and 81, respectively. Scores were interpreted with the Curved Grading Scale. The qualitative data showed that there were mixed views and perceptions from patients and physical therapists on satisfaction and acceptability.

Conclusion: This study gives insight in the usability of two biofeedback devices from the patient's and physical therapist's perspective. The overall usability from both perspectives seemed to be acceptable for OpenGo-Science. For SmartStep, overall usability seemed only acceptable from the patient's perspective.

Implication: The study findings could help clinicians to decide which biofeedback device is appropriate for their given situation and provide information for future development of biofeedback devices.

Citing Articles

Is an Ambulatory Biofeedback Device More Effective than Instructing Partial Weight-Bearing Using a Bathroom Scale? Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial with Healthy Subjects.

Merkle T, Hofmann N, Knop C, Da Silva T Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(19).

PMID: 39409483 PMC: 11479348. DOI: 10.3390/s24196443.

The Effect of Postoperative Physical Therapy Following Hip Fracture: A Literature Review.

Koudouna S, Evangelopoulos D, Sarantis M, Chronopoulos E, Dontas I, Pneumaticos S Cureus. 2023; 15(4):e37676.

PMID: 37206486 PMC: 10189836. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37676.

Can elderly individuals perform partial weight bearing on their lower limbs? A prospective cohort study using ambulatory real-time biofeedback.

Merkle T, Hofmann N, Knop C, Da Silva T J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):324.

PMID: 37106461 PMC: 10142256. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03807-4.

Versatile GCH Control Software for Correction of Loads Applied to Forearm Crutches During Gait Recovery Through Technological Feedback: Development and Implementation Study.

Chamorro-Moriana G, Sevillano J, Perez-Cabezas V J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(9):e27602.

PMID: 34550073 PMC: 8495581. DOI: 10.2196/27602.

Design and Development of a Virtual Reality-Based Mobility Training Game for People With Parkinson's Disease.

Finley J, Gotsis M, Lympouridis V, Jain S, Kim A, Fisher B Front Neurol. 2021; 11:577713.

PMID: 33519665 PMC: 7843522. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.577713.

References

DiStasio 2nd A, Jaggears F, DePasquale L, Frassica F, Turen C . Protected early motion versus cast immobilization in postoperative management of ankle fractures. Contemp Orthop. 1994; 29(4):273-7. View

Wessels R, de Witte L . Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of QUEST 2.0 with users of various types of assistive devices. Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25(6):267-72. DOI: 10.1080/0963828021000031197. View

Hurkmans H, Bussmann J, Benda E, Verhaar J, Stam H . Techniques for measuring weight bearing during standing and walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2003; 18(7):576-89. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(03)00116-5. View

Dabke H, Gupta S, Holt C, OCallaghan P, Dent C . How accurate is partial weightbearing?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (421):282-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000127116.13377.65. View

Vasarhelyi A, Baumert T, Fritsch C, Hopfenmuller W, Gradl G, Mittlmeier T . Partial weight bearing after surgery for fractures of the lower extremity--is it achievable?. Gait Posture. 2005; 23(1):99-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.12.005. View

Hensel B, Demiris G, Courtney K . Defining obtrusiveness in home telehealth technologies: a conceptual framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006; 13(4):428-31. PMC: 1513674. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2026. View

Isakov E . Gait rehabilitation: a new biofeedback device for monitoring and enhancing weight-bearing over the affected lower limb. Eura Medicophys. 2006; 43(1):21-6. View

Hurkmans H, Bussmann J, Selles R, Benda E, Stam H, Verhaar J . The difference between actual and prescribed weight bearing of total hip patients with a trochanteric osteotomy: long-term vertical force measurements inside and outside the hospital. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(2):200-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.11.005. View

Daniels J, Fels S, Kushniruk A, Lim J, Ansermino J . A framework for evaluating usability of clinical monitoring technology. J Clin Monit Comput. 2007; 21(5):323-30. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-007-9091-y. View

10.

Denhaerynck K, Schafer-Keller P, Young J, Steiger J, Bock A, de Geest S . Examining assumptions regarding valid electronic monitoring of medication therapy: development of a validation framework and its application on a European sample of kidney transplant patients. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8:5. PMC: 2275282. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-5. View

11.

Arthanat S, Bauer S, Lenker J, Nochajski S, Wu Y . Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009; 2(4):235-48. DOI: 10.1080/17483100701343665. View

12.

Borsci S, Federici S, Lauriola M . On the dimensionality of the System Usability Scale: a test of alternative measurement models. Cogn Process. 2009; 10(3):193-7. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-009-0268-9. View

13.

Shah S, Robinson I, AlShawi S . Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009; 25(4):514-21. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462309990328. View

14.

Rubin G, Monder O, Zohar R, Oster A, Konra O, Rozen N . Toe-touch weight bearing: myth or reality?. Orthopedics. 2010; 33(10):729. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100826-02. View

15.

De Bleser L, de Geest S, Vincke B, Ruppar T, Vanhaecke J, Dobbels F . How to test electronic adherence monitoring devices for use in daily life: a conceptual framework. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011; 29(9):489-95. DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e31821a1555. View

16.

Hustedt J, Blizzard D, Baumgaertner M, Leslie M, Grauer J . Is it possible to train patients to limit weight bearing on a lower extremity?. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(1):e31-7. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20111122-14. View

17.

De Bleser L, Vincke B, Dobbels F, Happ M, Maes B, Vanhaecke J . A new electronic monitoring device to measure medication adherence: usability of the Helping Hand™. Sensors (Basel). 2012; 10(3):1535-52. PMC: 3264437. DOI: 10.3390/s100301535. View

18.

Mavcic B, Antolic V . Optimal mechanical environment of the healing bone fracture/osteotomy. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(4):689-95. PMC: 3311788. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1487-8. View

19.

Hurkmans H, Bussmann J, Benda E, Verhaar J, Stam H . Effectiveness of audio feedback for partial weight-bearing in and outside the hospital: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93(4):565-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.019. View

20.

Hustedt J, Blizzard D, Baumgaertner M, Leslie M, Grauer J . Current advances in training orthopaedic patients to comply with partial weight-bearing instructions. Yale J Biol Med. 2012; 85(1):119-25. PMC: 3313526. View