» Articles » PMID: 27794320

Development of a Multi-category Psychometric Function to Model Categorical Loudness Measurements

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2016 Oct 31
PMID 27794320
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A multi-category psychometric function (MCPF) is introduced for modeling the stimulus-level dependence of perceptual categorical probability distributions. The MCPF is described in the context of individual-listener categorical loudness scaling (CLS) data. During a CLS task, listeners select the loudness category that best corresponds to their perception of the presented stimulus. In this study, CLS MCPF results are reported for 37 listeners (15 normal hearing, 22 with hearing loss). Individual-listener MCPFs were parameterized, and a principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify sources of inter-subject variability and reduce the dimensionality of the data. A representative "catalog" of potential listener MCPFs was created from the PCA results. A method is introduced for using the MCPF catalog and maximum-likelihood estimation, together, to derive CLS functions for additional participants; this technique improved the accuracy of the CLS results and provided a MCPF model for each listener. Such a technique is particularly beneficial when a relatively low number of measurements are available (e.g., International Standards Organization adaptive-level CLS testing). In general, the MCPF is a flexible tool that can characterize any type of ordinal, level-dependent categorical data. For CLS, the MCPF quantifies the suprathreshold variability across listeners and provides a model for probability-based analyses and methods.

Citing Articles

Toward parametric Bayesian adaptive procedures for multi-frequency categorical loudness scaling.

Shen Y, Petersen E, Neely S J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 156(1):262-277.

PMID: 38980101 PMC: 11240213. DOI: 10.1121/10.0026592.


Evaluation of Remote Categorical Loudness Scaling.

Kopun J, Turner M, Harris S, Kamerer A, Neely S, Rasetshwane D Am J Audiol. 2021; 31(1):45-56.

PMID: 34890217 PMC: 9128724. DOI: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00099.


Maximum Expected Information Approach for Improving Efficiency of Categorical Loudness Scaling.

Fultz S, Neely S, Kopun J, Rasetshwane D Front Psychol. 2020; 11:578352.

PMID: 33281677 PMC: 7705216. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578352.


Deriving loudness growth functions from categorical loudness scaling data.

Wroblewski M, Rasetshwane D, Neely S, Jesteadt W J Acoust Soc Am. 2018; 142(6):3660.

PMID: 29289103 PMC: 5736394. DOI: 10.1121/1.5017618.

References
1.
Rasetshwane D, Trevino A, Gombert J, Liebig-Trehearn L, Kopun J, Jesteadt W . Categorical loudness scaling and equal-loudness contours in listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015; 137(4):1899-913. PMC: 4417023. DOI: 10.1121/1.4916605. View

2.
Heeren W, Hohmann V, Appell J, Verhey J . Relation between loudness in categorical units and loudness in phons and sones. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013; 133(4):EL314-9. DOI: 10.1121/1.4795217. View

3.
NIEMEYER W . Relations between the discomfort level and the reflex threshold of the middle ear muscles. Audiology. 1971; 10(3):172-6. DOI: 10.3109/00206097109072555. View

4.
Florentine M, Buus S, Geng W . Toward a clinical procedure for narrowband gap detection I: a psychophysical procedure. Audiology. 2000; 39(3):161-7. View

5.
Oetting D, Brand T, Ewert S . Optimized loudness-function estimation for categorical loudness scaling data. Hear Res. 2014; 316:16-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.07.003. View