» Articles » PMID: 27794286

Spectrotemporal Weighting of Binaural Cues: Effects of a Diotic Interferer on Discrimination of Dynamic Interaural Differences

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2016 Oct 31
PMID 27794286
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Spatial judgments are often dominated by low-frequency binaural cues and onset cues when binaural cues vary across the spectrum and duration, respectively, of a brief sound. This study combined these dimensions to assess the spectrotemporal weighting of binaural information. Listeners discriminated target interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD) carried by the onset, offset, or full duration of a 4-kHz Gabor click train with a 2-ms period in the presence or absence of a diotic 500-Hz interferer tone. ITD and ILD thresholds were significantly elevated by the interferer in all conditions and by a similar amount to previous reports for static cues. Binaural interference was dramatically greater for ITD targets lacking onset cues compared to onset and full-duration conditions. Binaural interference for ILD targets was similar across dynamic-cue conditions. These effects mirror the baseline discriminability of dynamic ITD and ILD cues [Stecker and Brown. (2010). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 3092-3103], consistent with stronger interference for less-robust/higher-variance cues. The results support the view that binaural cue integration occurs simultaneously across multiple variance-weighted dimensions, including time and frequency.

Citing Articles

Age-Related Changes in Interaural-Level-Difference-Based Across-Frequency Binaural Interference.

Goupell M Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:887401.

PMID: 35966775 PMC: 9363899. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.887401.


The effect of target and interferer frequency on across-frequency binaural interference of interaural-level-difference sensitivity.

Rosen B, Goupell M J Acoust Soc Am. 2022; 151(2):924.

PMID: 35232088 PMC: 8837388. DOI: 10.1121/10.0009398.


Spectro-temporal weighting of interaural time differences in speech.

Baltzell L, Cho A, Swaminathan J, Best V J Acoust Soc Am. 2020; 147(6):3883.

PMID: 32611137 PMC: 7297545. DOI: 10.1121/10.0001418.


Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.

Gifford R, Stecker G Hear Res. 2020; 390:107929.

PMID: 32182551 PMC: 7187911. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107929.


Binaural interference with simulated electric acoustic stimulation.

van Ginkel C, Gifford R, Stecker G J Acoust Soc Am. 2019; 145(4):2445.

PMID: 31046315 PMC: 6491346. DOI: 10.1121/1.5098784.


References
1.
Bernstein L, Trahiotis C . The apparent immunity of high-frequency "transposed" stimuli to low-frequency binaural interference. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 116(5):3062-9. DOI: 10.1121/1.1791892. View

2.
Buell T, Hafter E . Combination of binaural information across frequency bands. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991; 90(4 Pt 1):1894-900. DOI: 10.1121/1.401668. View

3.
Heller L, Richards V . Binaural interference in lateralization thresholds for interaural time and level differences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 128(1):310-9. PMC: 2921431. DOI: 10.1121/1.3436524. View

4.
WOODS W, Colburn H . Test of a model of auditory object formation using intensity and interaural time difference discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992; 91(5):2894-902. DOI: 10.1121/1.402926. View

5.
Brainard D . The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis. 1997; 10(4):433-6. View