» Articles » PMID: 27785429

Predictive Models and Prognostic Factors for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: a Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Overview
Date 2016 Oct 28
PMID 27785429
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the context of customized patient care for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), decision-making could be facilitated by risk assessment and prediction tools. The aim of this study was to provide a critical overview of existing predictive models and to review emerging promising prognostic factors for UTUC. A literature search of articles published in English from January 2000 to June 2016 was performed using PubMed. Studies on risk group stratification models and predictive tools in UTUC were selected, together with studies on predictive factors and biomarkers associated with advanced-stage UTUC and oncological outcomes after surgery. Various predictive tools have been described for advanced-stage UTUC assessment, disease recurrence and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Most of these models are based on well-established prognostic factors such as tumor stage, grade and lymph node (LN) metastasis, but some also integrate newly described prognostic factors and biomarkers. These new prediction tools seem to reach a high level of accuracy, but they lack external validation and decision-making analysis. The combinations of patient-, pathology- and surgery-related factors together with novel biomarkers have led to promising predictive tools for oncological outcomes in UTUC. However, external validation of these predictive models is a prerequisite before their introduction into daily practice. New models predicting response to therapy are urgently needed to allow accurate and safe individualized management in this heterogeneous disease.

Citing Articles

Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma: A Unique Immuno-Molecular Entity and a Clinical Challenge in the Current Therapeutic Scenario.

Mazzaschi G, Giudice G, Coriano M, Campobasso D, Perrone F, Maffezzoli M Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023; 22:15330338231159753.

PMID: 36855829 PMC: 9983117. DOI: 10.1177/15330338231159753.


Serum albumin to globulin ratio prior to treatment as a potential non-invasive prognostic indicator for urological cancers.

Xia Z, Fu X, Yuan X, Li J, Wang H, Sun J Front Nutr. 2022; 9:1012181.

PMID: 36386921 PMC: 9643875. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1012181.


A novel LASSO-derived prognostic model predicting survival for non-small cell lung cancer patients with M1a diseases.

Chen H, Huang C, Ge H, Chen Q, Chen J, Li Y Cancer Med. 2022; 11(6):1561-1572.

PMID: 35128839 PMC: 8921928. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4560.


Preoperative hydronephrosis predicts adverse pathological features and postoperative survival in patients with high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Qian S, Liang C, Ding Y, Wang C, Shen H Int Braz J Urol. 2020; 47(1):159-168.

PMID: 33047921 PMC: 7712693. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0021.


Nomogram construction for predicting survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural or pericardial effusion based on SEER analysis of 10,268 patients.

Tian T, Zhang P, Zhong F, Sun C, Zhou J, Hu W Oncol Lett. 2020; 19(1):449-459.

PMID: 31897158 PMC: 6923903. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.11112.


References
1.
Favaretto R, Shariat S, Savage C, Godoy G, Chade D, Kaag M . Combining imaging and ureteroscopy variables in a preoperative multivariable model for prediction of muscle-invasive and non-organ confined disease in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int. 2011; 109(1):77-82. PMC: 4319659. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10288.x. View

2.
Raman J, Warrick J, Caruso C, Yang Z, Shuman L, Bruggeman R . Altered Expression of the Transcription Factor Forkhead Box A1 (FOXA1) Is Associated With Poor Prognosis in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract. Urology. 2016; 94:314.e1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.05.030. View

3.
Colin P, Ouzzane A, Yates D, Audenet F, Francois A, Pignot G . Influence of positive surgical margin status after radical nephroureterectomy on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19(11):3613-20. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2453-9. View

4.
Yates D, Hupertan V, Colin P, Ouzzane A, Descazeaud A, Long J . Cancer-specific survival after radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: proposal and multi-institutional validation of a post-operative nomogram. Br J Cancer. 2012; 106(6):1083-8. PMC: 3304431. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.64. View

5.
Otto W, Shariat S, Fritsche H, Gupta A, Matsumoto K, Kassouf W . Concomitant carcinoma in situ as an independent prognostic parameter for recurrence and survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter analysis of 772 patients. World J Urol. 2011; 29(4):487-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0645-8. View