» Articles » PMID: 27780048

Parallel Computations in Insect and Mammalian Visual Motion Processing

Overview
Journal Curr Biol
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biology
Date 2016 Oct 26
PMID 27780048
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sensory systems use receptors to extract information from the environment and neural circuits to perform subsequent computations. These computations may be described as algorithms composed of sequential mathematical operations. Comparing these operations across taxa reveals how different neural circuits have evolved to solve the same problem, even when using different mechanisms to implement the underlying math. In this review, we compare how insect and mammalian neural circuits have solved the problem of motion estimation, focusing on the fruit fly Drosophila and the mouse retina. Although the two systems implement computations with grossly different anatomy and molecular mechanisms, the underlying circuits transform light into motion signals with strikingly similar processing steps. These similarities run from photoreceptor gain control and spatiotemporal tuning to ON and OFF pathway structures, motion detection, and computed motion signals. The parallels between the two systems suggest that a limited set of algorithms for estimating motion satisfies both the needs of sighted creatures and the constraints imposed on them by metabolism, anatomy, and the structure and regularities of the visual world.

Citing Articles

Changes in Vertical Stratification of Neotropical Nymphalid Butterflies at Forest Edges Are Not Directly Caused by Light and Temperature Conditions.

Oye B, Hill R Insects. 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39859645 PMC: 11765654. DOI: 10.3390/insects16010064.


Universality of representation in biological and artificial neural networks.

Hosseini E, Casto C, Zaslavsky N, Conwell C, Richardson M, Fedorenko E bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39764030 PMC: 11703180. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.26.629294.


Humans can use positive and negative spectrotemporal correlations to detect rising and falling pitch.

Vaziri P, McDougle S, Clark D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39131316 PMC: 11312537. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.03.606481.


Broken time reversal symmetry in visual motion detection.

Wu N, Zhou B, Agrochao M, Clark D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38915608 PMC: 11195140. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.08.598068.


Hue selectivity from recurrent circuitry in Drosophila.

Christenson M, Sanz Diez A, Heath S, Saavedra-Weisenhaus M, Adachi A, Nern A Nat Neurosci. 2024; 27(6):1137-1147.

PMID: 38755272 PMC: 11537989. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-024-01640-4.


References
1.
Ruderman , Bialek . Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods. Phys Rev Lett. 1994; 73(6):814-817. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.814. View

2.
Laughlin S, de Ruyter van Steveninck R, Anderson J . The metabolic cost of neural information. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 1(1):36-41. DOI: 10.1038/236. View

3.
Dacey D, Packer O, Diller L, Brainard D, Peterson B, Lee B . Center surround receptive field structure of cone bipolar cells in primate retina. Vision Res. 2000; 40(14):1801-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00039-0. View

4.
Franz M, Krapp H . Wide-field, motion-sensitive neurons and matched filters for optic flow fields. Biol Cybern. 2000; 83(3):185-97. DOI: 10.1007/s004220000163. View

5.
Kim K, Rieke F . Temporal contrast adaptation in the input and output signals of salamander retinal ganglion cells. J Neurosci. 2001; 21(1):287-99. PMC: 6762442. View