» Articles » PMID: 27773292

Characterizing the Cavitation Development and Acoustic Spectrum in Various Liquids

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2016 Oct 25
PMID 27773292
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A bespoke cavitometer that measures acoustic spectrum and is capable of operating in a range of temperatures (up to 750°C) was used to study the cavitation behaviour in three transparent liquids and in molten aluminium. To relate these acoustic measurements to cavitation development, the dynamics of the cavitation bubble structures was observed in three Newtonian, optically transparent liquids with significantly different physical properties: water, ethanol, and glycerine. Each liquid was treated at 20kHz with a piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer coupled to a titanium sonotrode with a tip diameter of 40mm. Two different transducer power levels were deployed: 50% and 100%, with the maximum power corresponding to a peak-to-peak amplitude of 17μm. The cavitation structures and the flow patterns were filmed with a digital camera. To investigate the effect of distance from the ultrasound source on the cavitation intensity, acoustic emissions were measured with the cavitometer at two points: below the sonotrode and near the edge of the experimental vessel. The behaviour of the three tested liquids was very different, implying that their physical parameters played a decisive role in the establishment of the cavitation regime. Non dimensional analysis revealed that water shares the closest cavitation behaviour with liquid aluminium and can therefore be used as its physical analogue in cavitation studies; this similarity was also confirmed when comparing the measured acoustic spectra of water and liquid aluminium.

Citing Articles

Synchronized acoustic emission and high-speed imaging of cavitation-induced atomization: The role of shock waves.

Priyadarshi A, Prentice P, Eskin D, Lee P, Tzanakis I Ultrason Sonochem. 2025; 113:107233.

PMID: 39847917 PMC: 11795154. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2025.107233.


Optimizing degassing for particle-reinforced Al composite: Advanced ultrasonic-assisted argon treatment and numerical simulation insights.

Chen J, Jin X, Geng J, Luo X, Li Y, Xia P Ultrason Sonochem. 2024; 111:107092.

PMID: 39426030 PMC: 11513848. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.107092.


Impact of ultrasonic probe type, frequency, and static pressure on large-scale graphene exfoliation.

Gao M, Zong H, Yu L, Yao J, Zhao S, Zhou Y Ultrason Sonochem. 2024; 111:107103.

PMID: 39423457 PMC: 11532260. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.107103.


Coupling Low-Frequency Ultrasound to a Crossflow Microfiltration Pilot: Effect of Ultrasonic Pulse Application on Sono-Microfiltration of Jackfruit Juice.

Miramontes-Escobar H, Hengl N, Dornier M, Montalvo-Gonzalez E, Chacon-Lopez M, Achir N Membranes (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39330533 PMC: 11433797. DOI: 10.3390/membranes14090192.


Experimental study on attenuation effect of liquid viscosity on shockwaves of cavitation bubbles collapse.

Luo J, Fu G, Xu W, Zhai Y, Bai L, Li J Ultrason Sonochem. 2024; 111:107063.

PMID: 39293096 PMC: 11421259. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.107063.