» Articles » PMID: 27766000

Location, Quality and Choice of Hospital: Evidence from England 2002-2013

Overview
Date 2016 Oct 22
PMID 27766000
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigate (a) how patient choice of hospital for elective hip replacement is influenced by distance, quality and waiting times, (b) differences in choices between patients in urban and rural locations, (c) the relationship between hospitals' elasticities of demand to quality and the number of local rivals, and how these changed after relaxation of constraints on hospital choice in England in 2006. Using a data set on over 500,000 elective hip replacement patients over the period 2002 to 2013 we find that patients became more likely to travel to a provider with higher quality or lower waiting times, the proportion of patients bypassing their nearest provider increased from 25% to almost 50%, and hospital elasticity of demand with respect to own quality increased. By 2013 average hospital demand elasticity with respect to readmission rates and waiting times were - 0.2 and - 0.04. Providers facing more rivals had demand that was more elastic with respect to quality and waiting times. Patients from rural areas have smaller disutility from distance.

Citing Articles

Challenging selective contracting: reforms for enhancing patient empowerment in healthcare.

Leibner G, Gold D, Foreman G, Brammli-Greenberg S Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025; 14(1):12.

PMID: 40050967 PMC: 11887300. DOI: 10.1186/s13584-025-00673-9.


Exploratory analysis of factors influencing hospital preferences among the Lebanese population: a cross-sectional study.

El Zouki C, Chahine A, Ghadban E, Harb F, El-Eid J, El Khoury D BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e085727.

PMID: 39532358 PMC: 11574481. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085727.


Socioeconomic inequalities in waiting times for breast cancer surgery.

Matias M, Santos R, Siciliani L, Sivey P, Proctor A Health Econ. 2024; 34(2):203-224.

PMID: 39363389 PMC: 11700930. DOI: 10.1002/hec.4906.


Exploring the factors impacting choice and quality of overnight private hospital stays and consumer perspectives on patient reported experience measures (PREMs) in Australia: a qualitative interview study.

Verlis K, McCaffery K, Copp T, Dodd R, Laidsaar-Powell R, Nickel B J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024; 8(1):75.

PMID: 39030440 PMC: 11264639. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00755-3.


Impact of mobile Internet use on health-seeking behaviors: evidence from China.

Lin C, Lin H Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1403877.

PMID: 38966701 PMC: 11222596. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1403877.


References
1.
Hawkes N . Private hospitals look to NHS for elective operations as private medical insurance falls. BMJ. 2012; 345:e7510. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e7510. View

2.
Baldwin L, MacLehose R, Hart L, Beaver S, Every N, Chan L . Quality of care for acute myocardial infarction in rural and urban US hospitals. J Rural Health. 2004; 20(2):99-108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2004.tb00015.x. View

3.
Billings J, Blunt I, Steventon A, Georghiou T, Lewis G, Bardsley M . Development of a predictive model to identify inpatients at risk of re-admission within 30 days of discharge (PARR-30). BMJ Open. 2012; 2(4). PMC: 3425907. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001667. View

4.
Santos R, Gravelle H, Propper C . Does Quality Affect Patients' Choice of Doctor? Evidence from England. Econ J (London). 2017; 127(600):445-494. PMC: 5349292. DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12282. View

5.
Pope D . Reacting to rankings: evidence from "America's Best Hospitals". J Health Econ. 2009; 28(6):1154-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.08.006. View