» Articles » PMID: 27758809

Dying With a Left Ventricular Assist Device As Destination Therapy

Overview
Journal Circ Heart Fail
Date 2016 Oct 21
PMID 27758809
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite the ability of left ventricular assist device as destination therapy (DT-LVAD) to prolong survival for many patients with advanced heart failure, little is known about the eventual end-of-life care that patients with DT-LVAD receive.

Methods And Results: All patients undergoing DT-LVAD at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, from January 1, 2007, to September 30, 2014, who subsequently died before July 1, 2015, were included. Information about end-of-life care was obtained from documentation in the electronic medical record. Of 89 patients who died with a DT-LVAD, the median (25th-75th percentile) time from left ventricular assist device implantation to death was 14 (4-31) months. The most common causes of death were multiorgan failure (26%), hemorrhagic stroke (24%), and progressive heart failure (21%). Nearly half (46%) of the patients saw palliative care within 1 month before death; however, only 13 (15%) patients enrolled in hospice a median 11 (range 1-315) days before death. Most patients (78%) died in the hospital, of which 88% died in the intensive care unit. In total, 49 patients had their left ventricular assist device deactivated before death, with all but 3 undergoing deactivation in the hospital. Most patients died within an hour of left ventricular assist device deactivation and all within 26 hours.

Conclusions: In contrast to the general heart failure population, most patients with DT-LVAD die in the hospital and few use hospice. Further work is needed to understand these differences and to determine whether patients with DT-LVAD are receiving optimal end-of-life care.

Citing Articles

Multicenter exploration of specialist palliative care in patients with left ventricular assist devices - a retrospective study.

Tenge T, Shahinzad S, Meier S, Schallenburger M, Batzler Y, Schwartz J BMC Palliat Care. 2024; 23(1):229.

PMID: 39313780 PMC: 11421205. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01563-8.


Impact of cardiac patch alignment on restoring post-infarct ventricular function.

Janssens K, Bovendeerd P Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2024; 23(6):1963-1976.

PMID: 39088120 PMC: 11639681. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-024-01877-9.


End-of-Life Issues in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Garcia M, Grouls A Tex Heart Inst J. 2023; 50(4).

PMID: 37440292 PMC: 10660132. DOI: 10.14503/THIJ-23-8160.


Post-infarct evolution of ventricular and myocardial function.

Janssens K, Kraamer M, Barbarotta L, Bovendeerd P Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2023; 22(6):1815-1828.

PMID: 37405536 PMC: 10613149. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-023-01734-1.


End-of-Life Care for End-stage Heart Failure Patients.

Lee J, Hwang K Korean Circ J. 2022; 52(9):659-679.

PMID: 36097835 PMC: 9470494. DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2022.0211.


References
1.
Rose E, Gelijns A, Moskowitz A, Heitjan D, Stevenson L, Dembitsky W . Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002; 345(20):1435-43. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012175. View

2.
Teno J, Clarridge B, Casey V, Welch L, Wetle T, Shield R . Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA. 2004; 291(1):88-93. DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.1.88. View

3.
Murray S, Kendall M, Boyd K, Sheikh A . Illness trajectories and palliative care. BMJ. 2005; 330(7498):1007-11. PMC: 557152. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1007. View

4.
Lietz K, Long J, Kfoury A, Slaughter M, Silver M, Milano C . Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection. Circulation. 2007; 116(5):497-505. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691972. View

5.
Rizzieri A, Verheijde J, Rady M, McGregor J . Ethical challenges with the left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2008; 3:20. PMC: 2527574. DOI: 10.1186/1747-5341-3-20. View