» Articles » PMID: 27755577

Evidence for Karyotype Polymorphism in the Free-Living Flatworm, Macrostomum Lignano, a Model Organism for Evolutionary and Developmental Biology

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Oct 19
PMID 27755577
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over the past decade, the free-living flatworm Macrostomum lignano has been successfully used in many areas of biology, including embryology, stem cells, sexual selection, bioadhesion and aging. The increased use of this powerful laboratory model, including the establishment of genomic resources and tools, makes it essential to have a detailed description of the chromosome organization of this species, previously suggested to have a karyotype with 2n = 8 and one pair of large and three pairs of small metacentric chromosomes. We performed cytogenetic analyses for chromosomes of one commonly used inbred line of M. lignano (called DV1) and uncovered unexpected chromosome number variation in the form of aneuploidies of the largest chromosomes. These results prompted us to perform karyotypic studies in individual specimens of this and other lines of M. lignano reared under laboratory conditions, as well as in freshly field-collected specimens from different natural populations. Our analyses revealed a high frequency of aneuploids and in some cases other numerical and structural chromosome abnormalities in laboratory-reared lines of M. lignano, and some cases of aneuploidy were also found in freshly field-collected specimens. Moreover, karyological analyses were performed in specimens of three further species: Macrostomum sp. 8 (a close relative of M. lignano), M. spirale and M. hystrix. Macrostomum sp. 8 showed a karyotype that was similar to that of M. lignano, with tetrasomy for its largest chromosome being the most common karyotype, while the other two species showed a simpler karyotype that is more typical of the genus Macrostomum. These findings suggest that M. lignano and Macrostomum sp. 8 can be used as new models for studying processes of partial genome duplication in genome evolution.

Citing Articles

Optimized protocols for RNA interference in Macrostomum lignano.

Mouton S, Mougel A, Ustyantsev K, Dissous C, Melnyk O, Berezikov E G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38421640 PMC: 11075559. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae037.


Sex-limited experimental evolution drives transcriptomic divergence in a hermaphrodite.

Cirulis A, Norden A, Churcher A, Ramm S, Zadesenets K, Abbott J Genome Biol Evol. 2023; 16(1).

PMID: 38155579 PMC: 10786194. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evad235.


Unraveling the Unusual Subgenomic Organization in the Neopolyploid Free-Living Flatworm Macrostomum lignano.

Zadesenets K, Ershov N, Bondar N, Rubtsov N Mol Biol Evol. 2023; 40(12).

PMID: 37979163 PMC: 10733133. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msad250.


Genome assemblies of the simultaneously hermaphroditic flatworms Macrostomum cliftonense and Macrostomum hystrix.

Wiberg R, Brand J, Viktorin G, Mitchell J, Beisel C, Scharer L G3 (Bethesda). 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37398989 PMC: 10468722. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad149.


B Chromosomes in Free-Living Flatworms of the Genus (Platyhelminthes, Macrostomorpha).

Zadesenets K, Rubtsov N Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(24).

PMID: 34948412 PMC: 8708343. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413617.


References
1.
Comai L . The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat Rev Genet. 2005; 6(11):836-46. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1711. View

2.
Kim E, Punina E, Rodionov A . [Chromosome CPD(PI/DAPI)- and CMA/DAPI-banding patterns in Allium cepa L]. Genetika. 2002; 38(4):489-96. View

3.
Siegel J, Amon A . New insights into the troubles of aneuploidy. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2012; 28:189-214. PMC: 3919630. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155807. View

4.
Ramm S, Schlatter A, Poirier M, Scharer L . Hypodermic self-insemination as a reproductive assurance strategy. Proc Biol Sci. 2015; 282(1811). PMC: 4528547. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0660. View

5.
Reeves A . MicroMeasure: a new computer program for the collection and analysis of cytogenetic data. Genome. 2001; 44(3):439-43. View